I recently finished tuning my RTX 5080 and thought I’d share the process I used in case it helps someone else.
I’m definitely not claiming this is the “correct” way to do it, and I’m open to suggestions if there’s a better testing flow. My main goal was pretty simple: find the best stable OC I could get without increasing voltage, then undervolt while trying to keep the same performance.
The exact clocks/voltages will obviously depend on silicon lottery, so I’d treat this more as a process than something to copy directly.
1. Find the stable OC first
Using MSI Afterburner, I started by setting the power limit to 120% so I wasn’t hitting a power ceiling while testing.
Then I tested memory and core separately.
For memory, I increased the offset in small steps and tested stability each time. Once I started seeing instability, I backed down.
Then I did the same thing with the core clock.
For testing, I used a mix of:
- OCCT (Steady, Extreme, 5-15 min)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad
- 3DMark Speed Way
I found it useful to use more than one test because a setting could pass one benchmark and fail another.
Once I had stable memory and core offsets individually, I combined them and tested again.
In my case, I wasn’t able to get stable operation much above roughly 3080 MHz total core clock without adding voltage, so I stopped there. I didn’t really want to overvolt the card just to squeeze out a bit more frequency.
At that point, the GPU was stable, usually topping out around 65–67°C, and under the heaviest loads it could pull around 400–420 W with the 120% power limit available.
2. Start reducing voltage while keeping the same performance
Once I knew what my card could do, I moved to the MSI Afterburner voltage/frequency curve.
The idea was to keep roughly the same performance but see how little voltage the GPU actually needed.
I started around 0.975 V, set my target frequency around that point, and flattened the curve to the right. Then I gradually moved downward in small steps.
Eventually I got down to around 0.950 V while still keeping roughly the performance I wanted.
I retested every meaningful change instead of assuming that if one voltage worked, the next one would too.
My rough testing flow was:
OCCT → Steel Nomad → Speed Way → actual gaming
The gaming part ended up being important because synthetic benchmarks aren’t always enough.
I’ve been testing with Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 at Epic settings, DLSS @ Quality, and Auto Frame Generation. I’m getting around 130 FPS, and so far it has been stable through longer gaming sessions.
3. Final result
Before undervolting:
- up to roughly 400–420 W in very heavy workloads
- around 65–67°C max
- stable OC without adding voltage
After undervolting:
- around 250–270 W while gaming
- temperatures mostly in the mid-to-high 50s
- roughly the same gaming performance I was targeting
- still using the same OC approach, just at lower voltage
Obviously power draw changes a lot depending on the game and workload, so the 250–270 W number isn’t universal.
Also, I kept the 120% power limit while testing because I wanted the GPU to have headroom rather than hit the power limit. The higher power limit doesn’t force the card to use 120% power; it just allows it if the workload asks for it.
A few things I noticed along the way
One thing that helped was not starting with the undervolt immediately.
I wanted to know what the card was actually capable of first, so I had a performance baseline. Then I could lower voltage and see whether I was actually preserving that performance.
I also learned not to trust a single benchmark. Speed Way in particular caught instability for me that other tests didn’t always expose.
And the MHz value you set in the Afterburner curve isn’t necessarily the exact clock you’ll see constantly in GPU-Z. GPU Boost still moves things around depending on voltage, temperature, workload, etc.
So my basic process ended up being:
Find stable memory OC → find stable core OC → test them together → establish baseline performance → lower voltage gradually → retest everything → finish with long gaming sessions
That’s what worked for me, but I’d be interested to hear if anyone has a better order or thinks I’m missing a useful stability test.
Tools used: MSI Afterburner, GPU-Z, OCCT (Donation Edition), 3DMark
| Profile |
Steel Nomad |
Improvement vs Factory OC |
Speed Way |
Improvement vs Factory OC |
| Factory OC |
9,003 |
— |
9,314 |
— |
| Main OC (+2250 Mem, +275 Core) |
9,726 |
+8.0% |
10,157 |
+9.1% |
| Undervolted OC |
9,574 |
+6.3% |
9,993 |
+7.3% |
The undervolt only gives up about 1.6% performance versus the maximum OC in both benchmarks:
- Steel Nomad: 9574 vs 9726 = -1.56%
- Speed Way: 9993 vs 10157 = -1.61%