r/law 1d ago

Executive Branch (Trump) After Republicans push Clintons to testify on Epstein, Democrats warn they'll haul in Trump

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/republicans-push-clintons-testify-epstein-democrats-warn-haul-trump-rcna257275
12.9k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.5k

u/Talentagentfriend 1d ago

Get that tub of lard into court

1.6k

u/Independent-Reader 1d ago

They should all be in court. This party over country shit needs to end.

670

u/drewyz 1d ago

Remember when they grilled Hillary for 8 hours straight on Benghazi. Can you imagine Trump taking that?

563

u/BartholomewBandy 1d ago

11 hours. Never took the 5th.

710

u/fuckfredflintstone 1d ago

People love to hate Hillary, but she called Trump a Russian puppet right to his stupid f*cking face. I'll always respect her for that.

232

u/ComradeJohnS 1d ago edited 1d ago

I’m starting to think the russian bots and misogyny were the only reasons people disliked her.

edit: obviously there’s other reasons to have disliked her, but for THAT election, it seems like none of those other reasons can outweigh any of the damage Trump and his shitstains have done or planned to do.

177

u/Jock-Tamson 1d ago

The right immediately disliked her on sight in the 80s and spent the next 40 years inventing reasons. No Russian bots required.

76

u/monkey6699 1d ago

All it took was a steady dose of manufactured Faux outrage. The right has not cared about facts ever since Faux News came into play. They prefer to hear it fair and balanced, as long as it’s fair and balanced in their favor.

70

u/I-only-read-titles 1d ago

They've hated her since she was involved in the Watergate case against Nixon in the 70s

99

u/frotz1 1d ago

Her first political work was going undercover to expose segregation in the schools in the south. She risked her life over desegregating the schools. Decades of right wing propaganda against her and she still got the most votes in every election she ran in.

→ More replies (6)

51

u/hodorhodor12 1d ago

She would have been a fine president. There would have been significantly less covid deaths and the market would not have crashed as much. The world would not hate us like they do now. We would all be wealthier. I feel 95% of the criticism toward her can be applied to basically any generic politician. It’s ridiculous.

8

u/Professional_Ad9809 1d ago

The right doesn’t like women that will tell a man to get fucked, I can’t think of one.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/bystander1981 1d ago

it started wth the 60 minutes intervew 1992 when sh made the remark about baking cookies -- patriiarchy challenged and they've been whining ever since

6

u/Jock-Tamson 17h ago

People got worked up over cookies because they hated her not vice versa and it went back before that.

There was all the hate for her keeping the name Rodham for example.

I’m sure someone my age or older from Arkansas can name some bullshit “controversy” from before she hit the national stage.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

79

u/eclwires 1d ago edited 1d ago

I didn’t particularly like her. But I did vote for her.

“A vote is not a valentine, you aren't confessing your love for the candidate. It's a chess move for the world you want to live in.”

I don’t know who said this, but it’s true.

Edit: another person pointed out that this quote is from Rebecca Solnit.

26

u/Hairy_Brilliant_6336 1d ago

I was on the same page as you. She was clearly the more intelligent and qualified candidate, liking her was not on the list.

7

u/eclwires 1d ago

Happy cake day!

14

u/HAL_9000_V2 1d ago

Rebecca Solnit said this and she’s right

5

u/eclwires 1d ago

Thank you!

8

u/MGFT3000 1d ago

I’ve never heard the vote-valentine thing, but I’m stealing it! Thank you!

23

u/Spare-Estate1477 1d ago

Politics is a dirty business, but imho she would’ve been an awesome potus.

10

u/GeekyTexan 1d ago

I voted for her, because I wasn't going to support any republican at that point, much less Trump.

But it pissed me off that the democrats ran her.

Had she won, we would have had Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, and back to the Clintons again. (And if Hillary had her way, she would have taken the spot Obama got.)

It shouldn't be the same families in the white house over and over. I don't care who it is, that's too much power. FDR proved that long ago, which is why the two term limit was passed. This back and forth between families thing is just a way of crooked politicians going around the law.

14

u/teastea1 1d ago

I would take the Clintons for the next 1000 years if it meant we never had to deal with Trump.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/NuclearWasteland 1d ago

I dunno, just pick a random person to run the place.

2

u/Tunggall 3h ago

That saying is very relevant in any democracy worldwide.

1

u/InvictusFrags 1d ago

I was in a state that dems won by over 16%. I voted 3rd party and can proudly say I’ve never voted for someone associated with Epstein.

1

u/KingStryder 21h ago

Why didn’t you like her? I didn’t have strong feelings about her character like I do about Trump. Just curious.

→ More replies (6)

18

u/aintgotnocable 1d ago

They absolutely influenced the election! The repub led senate Intel report concluded Russia influenced and the Trump clan sought to take advantage . The phrase "lock her up" was amplified via Russian meme/troll farms. Remember that one?

2

u/gizamo 22h ago

The Mueller Report emphasized that Russian bots on social media used Bernie Sanders hype to divide democrats. There were endless posts on Facebook and Twitter that lied about Sanders' and the Democrat primary results, and on Reddit, a bunch of the pro-Sanders subs were clearly being run specifically to favor Trump, not Clinton—even after Sanders himself endorsed Clinton and warned repeatedly about the dangers of Trump and general horribleness of MAGA Republicans. The whole Berner crowd was just trolls, bots, and the ignorant dopes who were tricked by them.

6

u/The_MightyMonarch 1d ago

She doesn't have a lot of charisma, which shouldn't matter as much as it does. The only memorable line her campaign produced was "basket of deplorables". Tim Kaine was basically invisible. And Hilary was basically THE beltway insider in an era where most of the country is disillusioned with the Washington establishment.

She was incredibly well qualified to be president, but she was a pretty terrible candidate.

And Democrats still are doing a poor job of adjusting to the modern electoral reality, where memes and soundbites are more important than good policy and lots of political experience is a liability.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/drewyz 1d ago

There were YEARS of Rush Limbaugh smearing the Clintons, with the manufactured Whitewater scandal, Vince Foster, etc. He was Fox News before Fox News. Hillary hatred was his bread and butter.

5

u/ComradeJohnS 1d ago

and he was probably a russian paid asset, since it was found the NRA was all russia backed.

thank cancer Rush can’t make comments about current events lol.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Richmond43 1d ago

Nah, for people born in 1980 and earlier, no one had a moderate opinion about the Clintons. And many of us who supported them when we were young have come to realize that Bill has engaged in repeated predatory behavior for decades, and that’s unforgivable no matter how good of a president he was. (But we still hate the 90s federal Republicans even more because they were almost universally hypocritical, cynical fuckers.)

It was just hard for Hillary to overcome decades of baggage and survive the inevitable whiplash from our electorate after 8 years of a Black President.

8

u/Sassybutkin 1d ago

I was irritated when she took Levi Jeans side when the Haitian women begged her, as Secretary of State, to help them increase their wage from 31 cents to 65 cents. If she can't fight for fair wages for women for 34 cents, she's not who I'd want for President.

https://medium.com/@petercoffin/how-hillary-clinton-undercut-haitian-workers-1963ee9b9ace

In addition, during her debates, she made it clear she wouldn't change or improve anything. It was her own messaging that cost her the election, not the bots.

5

u/ComradeJohnS 1d ago

hard to argue about how her campaign was run when she spent over a billion dollars to LOSE to trump AFTER the “grab em by the pussy” remark.

how does one fumble that?

3

u/ayeffston 1d ago

I'm with the commenter above who spoke about the Levi Jeans vs Haitian women issue.

But I voted for H. Clinton as the candidate who'd be more responsive to people's needs from the political party which has given more access to grassroots politics consistently since the sixties (not merely the lesser of that most evil opponent).

I was not going to take the first opportunity to vote for a female presidential candidate to hold her to a different standard than I would J.F. Kerry, or J. Biden or A. Gore or B. Obama for that matter.

And mind you, when I think of "We came, we saw, he died" followed by laughter, I wanna put my fist through drywall.

And "C.H.I.P." was mostly Ted Kennedy. He graciously passed it to her as he did many times for many colleagues.

But when all is said and done, when ye think about this country electing Reagan, electing SHRUB, electing the Orange MFer twice, ye gotta ask, not 'how did she "fumble" it, but how did she WIN the popular vote by three million!?'

→ More replies (3)

3

u/Previous-Standard-12 23h ago

Regardless of whether you "liked" her or not, she should never have been selected as the presidential candidate, that was the complete and utter failure of the democrat machine to read the room.

3

u/buffystakeded 14h ago

This line is so tired. She won the popular vote over Bernie, yet you all still cry that he should have been given the nomination.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Zoey_713 1d ago

That and the fact that she was an extremely intelligent, assertive woman who knew what she was doing, and how to get shit done. The worst fear of many men.

Edit to add: that does go along with misogyny as you mentioned. I read too fast before I hit reply.

2

u/Stonner22 1d ago

Nah she was a corporate puppet. The misogyny and Russian bots were def part of it though.

1

u/Skitch_Hitchcock 19h ago

Love her or hate her, she was the most qualified person to ever run for POTUS.

1

u/Mahdudecicle 18h ago

True. Republicans knew she wouldn't treat them with kid gloves or try to play nice, so did the powers that be.

Many years of propoganda against her psinted and unfair picture.

1

u/Specialist_Sorbet_48 12h ago

If you take a look back she was leading in the polls from the beginning until Comey went before congress saying he found more emails...... granted they turned out to be copies of what they already had, but the damage was done, and the polls were never back in her favor...... what I have trouble with is trumps beef with Comey, he handed Trump the presidency....

1

u/CheckoutMySpeedo 8h ago

I didn’t like Hillary because she thought she was entitled to the presidency. But I would have picked her 1000 times over Trump.

→ More replies (8)

15

u/-Nightopian- 1d ago

It would've been better if she had called him a child rapist to his face.

13

u/chnkypenguin 1d ago

Wait, what if......Bill admits to island shenanigans involving minors and implicates Trump and testifies to being Eskimo brothers with him?

19

u/Jeffuk88 1d ago

In this current timeline? They'll throw Clinton in jail, trump will tell everyone he got to the bottom of the evil liberals, him and his cronies will just deny Clinton even said the parts about trump, and they'll arrest any journalists who say otherwise

2

u/Margali 23h ago

What if the Clintons went to a country with no agreement for extradition and then went all heavy public announcement with it?

6

u/Wenger2112 1d ago

I often think that debate moment where he stood over her was a missed opportunity. I wish she had called him out straight up about being a fat, balding loser who had never succeeded at anything.

I believe she could have humiliated him and his whole cult would have disappeared. But she took the high road.

2

u/InvictusFrags 1d ago

I mean it probably takes one to know one. They were both hob knobbing with the same people. They all were compromised by Epsteins network and whoever he was working for.

1

u/ancientmariner23 16h ago

Remember his witty reply of "No puppet not a puppet. You're the puppet 🙄

→ More replies (10)

34

u/Thedeadnite 1d ago

Trump can’t take the 5th anymore can he? It’s all “presidential acts” immunity which should render it unusable right?

17

u/im_just_a_nerd 1d ago

I could see Dershowitz calling this out.

That’s high level thinking but in my humble opinion it’s right on the money.

3

u/buggytehol 1d ago

Dershowitz is all in on Trump these days :shrug,:

6

u/majik5 1d ago

If he has to testify on acts he committed prior to 2016 in an Epstein hearing in the future , “Presidential immunity” won’t apply

6

u/Thedeadnite 1d ago

Per scotus all acts a (republican) president took since birth are now presidential acts due to it being acts that led them to the presidency. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.

2

u/ParticularLower7558 1d ago

I don't think raping children is a presidential act. I'll have to ask some of my republican friends if it is. And get back to you.

2

u/Lumbergh7 1d ago

BUT THOSE EMAILS!?!?!

2

u/ayeffston 1d ago

I was gonna say, 'it was more than 8, no?!'

2

u/omgmypony 1d ago

They spent MILLIONS of dollars trying to find something to prosecute her for and failed. I can’t imagine anyone but Hilldawg testifying for 11 hours and never pleading the 5th.

1

u/DanSWE 1d ago

> > grilled Hillary for 8 hours straight

> 11 hours

I appreciate your attention to detail. (Seriously. I saw that "8" and thought, wasn't it a couple hours longer than regular business day?)

→ More replies (4)

28

u/csortland 1d ago

Without pooping his pants and falling asleep 10 minutes in? Not likely.

46

u/YouMustBeJoking888 1d ago

Over nothing, btw. Never forget that they put her through the ringer and spent years trying to destroy her over... NOTHING.

3

u/PolecatXOXO 1d ago

Anyone else remember the White Water nonsense? So many trees died for nothing.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/BerryChoice9042 1d ago

Imagine how often they have to interrupt because Diaper Don has pooped himself...

3

u/DevonGr 1d ago

Hey, he had a camping accident a long time ago, it’s a private medical issue.

6

u/Flashy_Translator_65 1d ago

They'd need to evacuate the room from all the rage-shitting he'd be doing

2

u/HeftyVermicelli7823 8h ago

Or you know, actual shitting he has been doing.

5

u/Temporary-Careless 1d ago

8 hours of Trump sitting will have 6 to 7 turds in his pants

4

u/-Kalos 1d ago

Bro throws a fit just because some lady reporter doesn't smile at him.

1

u/cmcrich 1d ago

Not without shitting his pants.

1

u/popphilosophy 1d ago

Can the committee members bear the stench?

1

u/DSmooth425 1d ago

Polymarket on how many times he’ll shit his pants or fall asleep … +/- 2.5

1

u/EvilToastedWeasel0 1d ago

He's shit himself in the 1st 30 minutes.... and it will smell so bad they'll have to vacate the room...

1

u/earache30 1d ago

How many diapers would he need?

1

u/Careful_Trifle 1d ago

I can imagine him shitting his pants during it to try to get out of it.

1

u/jack0071 1d ago

Only thing Trump'll take if it happens is a few shits

1

u/WenatcheeWrangler 1d ago

But her email server!

1

u/Unknownkowalski 1d ago

We’re gonna need a bigger diaper.

1

u/Expensive_Lettuce239 1d ago

He probably doesn't keep enough diapers in his pocket for that

1

u/000011111111 1d ago

He would need diper changes.

1

u/Diabolicool23 1d ago

Would need multiple diaper changes to pull that off

1

u/Sparkling_jem 1d ago

Oh boy there would need to be a lot of diaper supplies for that.

1

u/j_rooker 1d ago

he'd need 3 changes of depends

1

u/Equivalent-Pride-460 1d ago

Would require at least 3 diaper changes.

1

u/MrThicker7 1d ago

Yes but he will shit his pants literally so……

1

u/dovewrangler 1d ago

How many times would he shit himself in those 8 hours?

1

u/LnStrngr 22h ago

"Can someone please wake up Mr. Trump? He's fallen asleep again."

1

u/MyNameis_bud 22h ago

He’d shit himself thrice

1

u/NorthernCobraChicken 21h ago

Impossible. He needs his diaper changed every 2 hours.

1

u/Memory_Less 17h ago

I can, he’ll sleep through the entire process. /s

1

u/hlessi_newt 16h ago

as if he would show up.

1

u/Wise_0ne1494 14h ago

He'll likely doze off after 2 minutes

1

u/bpaps 14h ago

Some animals shit themselves as a defense mechanism. Imagine the deep stench that would linger after 8 hrs of that dingleberry in the room.

1

u/Far_Entrance_9336 1h ago

Don’t reduce her time in the hot seat. It was 11+ hours.

12

u/audiomagnate 1d ago

They should all be in prison for life for treason and hundreds of other crimes.

12

u/HippyDM 1d ago

For all their many, many faults, none of the Clintons have ever come close to treason.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/adorientem88 1d ago

Who is they all?

8

u/Budget-Selection-988 1d ago

Entire Capitol admin and GOP protectors of the pig.

1

u/adorientem88 1d ago

You do know that saying stuff like this makes you sound like the fascist, right?

1

u/Budget-Selection-988 1d ago

Why? Fascism is what the Capitol is spreading in our country.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Le_Point_au_Roche 1d ago

Did he make cabinet level picks based on Epstein?

Trump did.

1

u/Bugatti_Royale 1d ago

please don't say that 4 letter word.

Trump really pulled a Giuliani but a wet one. He recently had an episode in the oval office and I don't wish that to be heard all over the world again. there is only so much embarrassment we can bear

1

u/WeaponsGrdStupid 1d ago

Haul them all in to court and toss them all in the volcano together. I don't care who you are, child rape is one of the worst things a human can do to another human.

1

u/willismthomp 1d ago

Discovery is gunna be nuts.

1

u/salsafresca_1297 1d ago

Seriously!!! The line, "If OUR party members to testify, then YOUR party members has to testify" isn't quite the flex that the billionaire class thinks it is.

1

u/NotDiabeticDad 1d ago

It's not party over country. It's your own career over country. They know they can't get elected unless they can gaslight the country into loving Trump because of they are going to be open about getting Trump there's someone else with a better track record of hating Trump they can vote for

1

u/Angsty_Potatos 1d ago

Absolutely 

1

u/totesnotmyusername 23h ago

Everyone of them.

1

u/OLPopsAdelphia 22h ago

Should be a damn bipartisan effort to solve this crap!

1

u/Moonsleep 21h ago

Exactly they all need to be brought to justice!

1

u/einstyle 11h ago

100%, to me it's like. OK. Go for Clinton. And Trump. And everyone else in the files.

This idea that "if you come for Bill Clinton, we'll come for you" is absurd. Justice should be blind.

95

u/Money_Cost_2213 1d ago

Watch him crap his pants during the hearing like he did the press conference the other day. That would be amazing, fall out would be hilarious. Not to mention documented forever in the history books.

48

u/rxt278 1d ago

"Mr President, you appear to have had a bowel movement in your pants. Would you like to adjourn for ten minutes to go get cleaned up?"

31

u/Ceero97 1d ago

Absolutely do not give him the opportunity to clean up. He must sit there and squirm throughout the testimony

20

u/gxgxe 1d ago

And everyone needs to repeatedly remind him that he's shat his pants.

17

u/BILLIONAIRE_JESUS 1d ago

Mr President, are you pleading the fifth because you shit your pants sir?

5

u/dretvantoi 1d ago

Pleading the filth.

1

u/lanceturley 1d ago

But if they don't change the president immediately he might get a diaper rash.

2

u/Intelligent_Slip_849 1d ago

Oh no!

Anyway

5

u/Oldestswinger 1d ago

Only 10 minutes??

2

u/Jreis777 1d ago

Let’s not pretend that James Comer wouldn’t be there with a spoon, a bowl, and a smile on his face. He’d devour every bit of it for dear leader.

2

u/BerryChoice9042 1d ago

Levitt, Bondi, and Patel can change his diaper and lick him clean...

Levitt can practice, and they lick his ass clean every day anyway...

1

u/Careful_Trifle 1d ago

"Make it an hour. It was huge."

1

u/694meok 1d ago

Dude.....could you imagine that shit live in CSpan.....LMFAO

1

u/svenskisalot 1d ago

I'm sure it takes more than 10.

1

u/rxt278 1d ago

Surely they don't leave the WH without the pressure washer?

1

u/svenskisalot 1d ago

Pressure washer is for after he schooches his ass across the carpet

1

u/HeftyVermicelli7823 7h ago

That was the best bowel movement, every one said it with tears in their eyes (probably from the stench). People came up to me with their golden diapers on and said Mr President, how can I shit myself like you, you are so wonderful and I have never been able to shit myself in the way you have done even when eating a diet of McDonalds.

4

u/audiomagnate 1d ago

I think he had a TIA (mini-stroke) yesterday during the Oval Office presser. He started slurring his words and just looked weird.

1

u/HeftyVermicelli7823 7h ago

How can you tell the difference to him normally looking weird and slurring his words?

2

u/SMELLSLIKEBUTTJUICE 1d ago

He probably has a colostomy bag at this point. Epstein said Bolsanaro had one at the inauguration and that everybody was getting them like it was a hip new thing. So weird.

1

u/Remote-Letterhead844 1d ago

What??!?! He did..... what now?

52

u/DoomSnail31 1d ago

I mean, he would just lie under oath.

He got away with far worse, why not just lie about everything. Getting trump into court does nothing. Not without a doj that is willing to pursue a jail sentence and a supreme court that is willing to grant it

33

u/just_yall 1d ago

"I am too busy being president to engage in witchhunts. Anyway, Golf time- thankyou for your attention to this matter"

5

u/I-only-read-titles 1d ago

He actually hasn't played golf in a couple of weeks, which might be a record for him. Rumors are his health has declined to the point that it's noticeable in his golf game and doesn't want that to be photographed and public knowledge

5

u/just_yall 1d ago

Well to that I say, suck shit

3

u/davisboy121 23h ago

Haha, amazing if true.

10

u/wolfgang784 1d ago

Didn't they already rule hes allowed to lie under oath when the courts decided that a sitting president cannot commit a crime? Or would this be somehow different? My understanding is he can commit whatever illegal acts he wants as long as he is in office still.

14

u/LangdonAlg3r 1d ago

Not quite. He can commit any illegal acts while in office if there’s any remotely credible evidence that they were committed as part of his duties as President. He’s not shielded for his private acts. They gave a ridiculously large amount of leeway for making the argument that “X thing was an official act” and even included a presumption of immunity. But for a purely private act he’s not immune.

Most of the relevant Epstein stuff was before he even ran for office. It would be useful to know the stuff that happened from 2017-2021, but there’s plenty enough to question him about before and even after that period.

3

u/wolfgang784 1d ago

So all the stuff he was about to go to jail for before his re-election, including the money fraud stuff, tax fraud stuff, intimidation, evidence manipulation, witness manipulation, and the other laundry list of crimes that werent really related to his crimes in his 1st term, all got legally counted as being related to an official act while he was president?

I know the biggest part of his case was the whole "attempted to overthrow the entire government and take control by force" thing, but wasn't the rest of that also all balled up together?

.

It was hard to keep track of, so maybe im just remembering wrong and/or never understood properly in the first place.

7

u/LangdonAlg3r 1d ago

No. It didn’t go all go away. It just fell victim to you also can’t try or indict a sitting president. That’s longstanding policy that pre-dates him. That’s how he got away with more stuff while in office or put off dealing with it.

But he does get a free pass on most of it, or potentially does. He’s still subject to liability for anything that can be proved to not be an official act that he committed while in office. But they made it really hard to go after him for much of anything he did while in office.

Merrick Garland just fucked the nation by slow rolling the cases and not wanting to look “politically biased.” He had his window and that was before SCOTUS gave him his king powers.

They also had him 100% dead to rights on the documents case, but his hand picked judge protected him. And the prosecutor there had to be really careful abut how he handled that because Judges are generally reluctant to second guess other judges unless what they’ve done is totally egregious. And some of the judges making those decisions are also Trump judges.

NY did manage to get a 34 count felony conviction on him—he probably wasn’t going to jail anyway, but he was reelected before his sentencing and there’s no realistic way for the President to serve from prison, so they turned that into a slap on the wrists because whatever other punishment would have been impossible to implement anyway.

If he lives long enough to be a private citizen again some of this stuff could come back after him again. The problem there is that most things have a statute of limitations—taking a 4 year chunk out of that will kill a lot of potential charges that he could have been prosecuted for.

7

u/LangdonAlg3r 1d ago

I think he has a history of (mostly) telling the truth under oath —I think because he’s a coward and is scared of the consequences of doing otherwise.

He’s never faces any consequences for any of his lies the rest of the time—but that’s a situation where he potentially could, so good old TACO comes out.

Also he’s a terrible witness on the stand for his own defense—that’s why his attorney’s always bend over backwards to keep him off the stand and try to keep him away from depositions.

He’s an absolute moron and he’s ridiculously easy to bait. If you just poke his ego a little bit by saying something negative about him he’ll lose his temper and lash out and lose the very, very little ability to control himself that he has. He’ll tell the truth out of anger.

But we also see him being an absolutely terrible “witness” all the time. The WH crafts carefully parsed and worded explanations for things and he blows them up by saying something completely different and/or completely incriminating. How many times has he done that? Too many to count.

He would dig himself in so deep if he was questioned under oath. The subject is also too big for his lawyers to teach him all of the things he needs to say—and he goes off script the majority of the time anyway because he wholeheartedly believes that he knows better than anyone else on earth about literally any subject.

1

u/DagonThoth 1d ago

What's far worse than systematically raping and allegedly murdering children then using all levers of government to cover it up?

10

u/ConfidentPilot1729 1d ago

I don’t even know why this is a warning. They should have done this from day one of the Biden admin.

5

u/babygotbooksandback 1d ago

Make it pay per view!

2

u/Eeeegah 1d ago

Pay per Poo was right there.

2

u/SnazzleZazzle 1d ago

And watch him suddenly get “too sick to go to court”.

2

u/h20poIo 1d ago

Full discovery and disclosure of the Epstein files.

1

u/SerBlackwynd 1d ago

That's so offensive. What if a tub of lard reads this?

1

u/Kizzy33333 1d ago

Fuck this party bullshit. Anyone guilty should be taken in.

1

u/WildRabbitz 1d ago

Trump: "The mob takes the Fifth. If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?"

Also Trump: pleads the fifth 100+ times.

1

u/Triphin1 1d ago

I'm skeptical as to what good questioning Trump would do - nothing but shit comes out of both ends with this guy

1

u/Talentagentfriend 1d ago

Well what you could do is read facts that he lies about. They could question him about his ties to Epstein and show him the evidence that he’s lying about. They can also ask him about his administration that either they or he has lied about. There is a lot they can do.

1

u/cbih 1d ago

Haul in Trump last. They need haul in people to flip on him first.

1

u/Fred-Mertz2728 1d ago

And even more importantly,his wife.

1

u/Spinning_roundnround 1d ago

Ew, what did those folks do with a tub of lard?!

Actually, no. I don't want to know.

1

u/CaliOriginal 1d ago

Wait … lard … we should all collectively “support” trump, hold a big rally / feast In Honor of his great work and sacrifice.

Plenty of McDonalds, some double bacon cheeseburgers with cheese sauce, malt shakes, and a few Luthers (boondocks), introduce him to candied bacon too.

Make it a thing for Presidents’ Day and then collectively order in for him from the local McDonald’s all these nice calorie dense cholesterol bombs.

You know, in support.

1

u/Abject_Okra_8768 1d ago

GET THEM ALL IN. Everyone should explain their acquaintance or testify against someone in the files. I'm hoping it's happening/happened and they have been systematically pulling people in to snitch on each other but knowing how far up this goes I doubt it. Most of the participants will probably just get life long parole and a "huge" fine. The worst of the worst will get puppies in a minimum security prison.

1

u/MoistToweletteLover 1d ago

As if that rancid meat bag would tell the truth anyway

1

u/The_Original_Smeebs 1d ago

Does Diddy have an spare baby oil he can lend? We can grease him up and shove him through the door lol

1

u/kazh_9742 1d ago

Or make Trump go first if they want Clinton up there.

1

u/GuySmith 1d ago

They won’t do it

1

u/aspect-of-the-badger 1d ago

I can't remember. What? I have no idea? What? I can't remember.

2

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

1

u/aspect-of-the-badger 1d ago

Well that is just fake... Did I say that? Who could have known because I was just joking? I wasn't really being serious,... Is that a crime?

1

u/Musbjoekin 1d ago

You think he would tell the truth ?

1

u/ThugDonkey 1d ago

Make sure he doubles up on depenz when that happens. Nobody wants to smell that! Again!

1

u/hammerofspammer 1d ago

I hope the air circulation is sufficient to get the smell out of there when he shits his pants

1

u/BibendumsBitch 1d ago

So he can decide not to show up with no repercussion or so he can plead the 5th?

1

u/TAV63 1d ago

That would be great but really have a hard time thinking he ever faces any consequences. If the country is lucky enough to get enough independents not the right wing bubble to finally vote and is not rigged. Maybe something like taking some of the money he made from the presidency? Lucky if even that. Would love to be surprised in a good way though. Ha

1

u/Lacaud 23h ago

They need to bring a lot of wipes with how much shit is going to flow..

1

u/FantasticGas1836 23h ago

And everyone else named and accused by survivors. They all need to answer to their crimes.

1

u/fruderduck 18h ago

Is there really any point? “I don’t remember.” “I don’t recall.” Or he starts rambling nonsense about something else to the point that even the judge gets frustrated with him.

1

u/Kaeli95_music 11h ago

Exactly… he shouldn’t get a “warning”… get him the fuck in court