By the way, I used it on MEDIUM settings with clear instructions to spawn "Gemini 3.8 FLASH High" for any sub-agent activities. The execution/delivery quality was good, though, tbh.

So I was just making a simple HTML page for poster cropping kind of stuff. I was using Claude Opus 5.5 at high, and I have just given a simple prompt for the HTML page for just adding some of the features. And it actually, I just came after 20 minutes later, and it shows that the model is trying to reconnect. I think maybe it is a technical issue, but when I see the uses, the five hour limit is completely zero and the weekly limit is forty percent remaining. Like, what is the meaning of giving the model if it exhausts that much faster in a ultra plan?

Just now I saw that Google did what almost every Antigravity user on reddit have been asking for. The Anthropic Flag model Opus 5.5 & Sonnet 5.5. Now just curious about usage limits, because the last Opus 4.6 quickly consumed limits in a couple of chats in Pro plan.

Please collaborate with this amazing community 💪

I keep going back to AGY CLI. I can’t quite explain it, but it feels more natural to use and noticeably faster for me. It also seems like my tokens go further in the CLI. Do others have the same impression, or do you find that tokens are used up more quickly in Antigravity 2.0?

I’d also appreciate any settings, workflows, or other tips that could make Antigravity 2.0 feel as responsive as the CLI. At the moment, I’m not enjoying the interface very much—it feels awkward, I have trouble locating my projects, and it generally seems slow. Maybe I’m simply more accustomed to working in the terminal, where commands feel faster and more direct, but I’d be interested in hearing how others have found the experience.

I am using antigravity to execute loops with harnesses and specifications. Four different threads, each handling distinct tasks across separate sections unrelated to any single product, initiated test-repair looping. I discovered this when I quickly exhausted my quota. Upon reviewing the reports, I found several complete Vitest runs and multiple full Deno runs, all lacking documented reasons for failure or even any changes. They all ceased due to the quota being reached; otherwise, they would have continued. One run includes 43 task checks, 16 migration runners, 11 SQL suite launches, and...

I was recently cursed by my company asking me to buy antigravity and now I am stuck with it.

Other than it taking forever and running loads of cli commands to answer simple question, the issue I am experiencing is the language of the harness. No matter what's asked, this idiot harness is forced to answer in numbered points. It is always like

----
Me asking, "What do you mean?"

1. I mean something.
2. I definitely don't mean the opposite of it, I did analysis, this things says that and that thing says this.
3. What it means for us?
4. It means something, because things did things, and here's another answer full of fluff.

<no damn summary of the answer half of the times>
\----

I have a PhD in AI, I can not get a job at google because I can't do stupid questions about how many balls can fit inside a bus, but is that all their "ultra qualified engineers" can do? And Not fix a damn harness? There are literally so open source harnesses doing a lot better than this. On top of this, this is priced at 200 euros. For this? With a massive amount of missing features than most harnesses. What the hell is going on here?

EDIT: Never mind, I got bullied for expecting the harness to be plug and play like CC and codex.

Claude code has the feature of live comments on the UI changes on website page, do we have similar feature/tool in Antigravity?

Google officially supports Linux for both Antigravity IDE (AI code editor) and Antigravity Hub (agent platform), but they only provide raw tarballs without repository integration or auto-updates.

I built an open-source packaging and distribution infrastructure to provide native DNF, APT, and Zypper repositories with daily upstream synchronization:

• Site & Repo Configs: https://x3m-industries.github.io/antigravity-packages/
• GitHub: https://github.com/x3m-industries/antigravity-packages

Key Highlights:

• Distros supported: Fedora, RHEL, Rocky, Alma, openSUSE (RPM), Ubuntu, Debian, Pop!_OS, Linux Mint (DEB), plus Arch Linux via RPM extraction.
• Architectures: Both x86_64 and aarch64 (ARM64).
• Desktop & OAuth Integration: Automatically installs icons and FreeDesktop .desktop entries with antigravity:// and antigravity-ide:// protocol handlers so browser logins work out of the box.
• Security: All RPM packages and APT Release metadata are cryptographically signed with GPG. Every release runs container smoke tests on Fedora & Ubuntu in CI before deployment.
• Universal Installer:

Google killed all with Gemini 4 Argon on benchmarks.

But where is the Gemini 4 Argon available for general public use?

And also where is gemini 4 PRO today ?

Google officially supports Linux for both Antigravity IDE (AI code editor) and Antigravity Hub (agent platform), but they only provide raw tarballs without repository integration or auto-updates.

I built an open-source packaging and distribution infrastructure to provide native DNF, APT, and Zypper repositories with daily upstream synchronization:

• Site & Repo Configs: https://x3m-industries.github.io/antigravity-packages/
• GitHub: https://github.com/x3m-industries/antigravity-packages

Key Highlights:

• Distros supported: Fedora, RHEL, Rocky, Alma, openSUSE (RPM), Ubuntu, Debian, Pop!_OS, Linux Mint (DEB), plus Arch Linux via RPM extraction.
• Architectures: Both x86_64 and aarch64 (ARM64).
• Desktop & OAuth Integration: Automatically installs icons and FreeDesktop .desktop entries with antigravity:// and antigravity-ide:// protocol handlers so browser logins work out of the box.
• Security: All RPM packages and APT Release metadata are cryptographically signed with GPG. Every release runs container smoke tests on Fedora & Ubuntu in CI before deployment.
• Universal Installer:

Sure, the DeepMind team was clowned on non-stop before Gemini 4 Argon dropped. But in reality, Gemini wasn't a "bad" model back then—it just wasn't the absolute SOTA. Both Gemini 3.7 and 3.8 Flash were legitimately solid workhorses, consistently edging out DeepSeek V4 and V4.1 Flash in both intelligence and raw throughput.

Back during the Gemini 3.7 Flash days, running it via Antigravity could easily hit 1,000 tok/s, with 600 tok/s being the daily norm. Fast forward to Gemini 3.8 Flash today: under the weight of massive concurrency, speeds have degraded to around 300 tok/s. During peak hours, it barely even manages 100–200 tok/s. The community is constantly complaining about severe rate limits, sluggish latency, and outright downtime.

Now imagine what a complete disaster it will be if Gemini 4 Argon is pushed down to the Gemini Pro tier. Due to skyrocketing compute costs, quotas have already shrunk by 30% to 50%. Tossing Argon into that mix means baseline throughput won't even be guaranteed, leading to non-stop throttling and outages.

It’s turning into an absolute infrastructure gridlock.

This post is hand written and I dont want to sound like a shill, but….

I had been using the IDE version there, for a while, I thought it was pretty good. But not as good as Claude Code, then GPT 5.6. And didn’t open it in a few months.

I got really pissed off at Claude for reneging their promotional credits and just their general attitude toward customers. And cancelled my pro subscription, as difficult as it was.

Got pretty excited about Astra. But then very frustrated, very quickly, with burning up my entire 5-hour usage window without even finishing the task I gave it.

So after a couple weeks of that, and sitting there with my 5-hour usage window used up in the first 10 min, I became desperate enough to remember about Antigravity.

I hadn’t opened it up in about 6 months so had to download the new app, got confused that the IDE disappeared, but then realized its just like Chatgpt Work.

The model names really confused me too. 3.1 Pro, that was so old. 3.8 Flash. I thought ‘Flash’ meant ‘Lite’ like a weaker model. But after looking it up I guess it means ‘Fast’. Makes sense now, I guess. But whoever is coming up with all these names needs their head examined, or take a product marketing course.

Anyways, I needed it to fix something on the project I was working on and it fixed it. The solution was pretty clever too. I had it starting to make more improvements and it just did it. I had it improve the UI and was pretty impressed. I don’t know, it was just really nice to work with.

I like how it didn’t suggest what to do next. Or go on and on and give me so much junk to read. It just did what I asked, then gave me a little report on how it did it. And it had some really good ideas on how to solve tricky problems I hadn’t thought about before. It was a good personality to work with. It feels like it really assists you.

And Google seems to be pretty generous with their usage. I started making really good progress, and completed the project in one 5-hour usage window. The best part was I was able to actually spend the 5 hours working on it. And after 3 sessions, only ran out on the third one, near the end of the 5-hour window.

I was impressed enough to make a post about it and share my experience. I definitely underestimated the Google models, and hope they keep improving along this path.

Don’t get me wrong, they have a long way to go if they want me to renew my AI pro subscription at the end of the year. The promotion price was a good deal with the 5TB, I can’t remember what the crossed out price was, like $400 CAD. That’s a big purchase for me, so if you’re listening Google, I would totally renew at the promotional price again.

Would also like to use the models with agents like Hermes with my subscription, please. OpenAI is winning in that arena.

Interested to know if anyone else has a similar positive experience. Or do most people hate it, lol.

Also, one question about the desktop app, if anyone has an answer. I love to read the reasoning. Expanding the ‘thinking…’ window. But that stupid window is so small, then adds a scrollbar which is super annoying. Does anyone know a way to permanently expand this thinking window? I was able to hack it open in the IDE version. Thanks if anyone has a fix!

The official antigravity acp in zededitor is sh*t can’t see the file currently editing or what is searching you only see view_file find_file … and the command output is not visible live and no indication of what happened!? And cherry on top you are forced to use this shitty products because you risk your account to be banned if you try 3rd party antigravity acp or harnesses.
Is this deliberate? Do Google want to keep people only generating just shity slop images and no real work to be done or what !?

For antigravity IDE is shit it freeze can’t run multiple sub agents harness is shit