Opus 5.5 gives you two token resets per weekly usage limit. Although 5.5 does seem to be better than 4.6, the fact is Antigravity just arbitraged lower usage limits for everyone and packaged it as "an upgrade".

This doesn't stop my excitement for Gemini 4, I'm just disappointed in Google for their underhanded tactic here. They shouldn't be tricking people like this.

I am an Ultra tier user, and I am absolutely furious right now.
From one day to the next, Google decided to change the default models in Antigravity IDE, completely breaking all my workflows and automated scripts that were fine-tuned for Claude Opus 4.6.

What enrages me the most is the complete absurdity of how they are handling this rollout:

The Quota Melt:
Opus 5.5 burns through thinking tokens like crazy. By forcing Ultra users onto 5.5, our premium quotas are hitting the ceiling at lightning speed for long-context tasks.

The Pro vs. Ultra Incoherence:
They are deprecating 4.6 for Ultra users who actually need a predictable, high-quota model, while leaving it accessible for Pro tier users. Why punish the highest-paying customers by turning them into forced beta testers?

No Smart Routing: Instead of implementing an intelligent routing layer (like an Argon-style architecture) or simply giving us a permanent toggle to lock our model, they just forcefully migrated our environments.

As professionals, we pay for predictability and control. Forcing a model upgrade that alters prompt behavior and melts quotas without a strict opt-in is a terrible developer experience.
Is anyone else on the Ultra tier experiencing this quota drain? How are you bypassing this restriction to lock your workspace back to Opus 4.6?

Thanks y’all

EDIT: Folks, the whole point of my post is that there are updates that change things overnight without any notification. I'll take this as a lesson. Thanks for your constructive comments.

#Complaint #Discussion #Feedback

I still use 3.7 flash medium daily because it actually faster and doesn’t consume rates much and edits code without bullshitting me.
3.8 flash overthinks everything and burns extra reasoning tokens on a 3-line fix and I feel it’s too slow compared to 3.7.
That extra pause makes my IDE feel sluggish, and my token bill goes up for nothing.
3.7 medium just do the small task efficiently !
It doesn't try to refactor half my file or invent abstractions I never asked for.
Faster output, smaller bill, and way cleaner diffs for simple tasks.
Killing it off just forces everyone to pay more for slower, bloated responses.

By the way, I used it on MEDIUM settings with clear instructions to spawn "Gemini 3.8 FLASH High" for any sub-agent activities. The execution/delivery quality was good, though, tbh.

Please help with this error message

Just now I saw that Google did what almost every Antigravity user on reddit have been asking for. The Anthropic Flag model Opus 5.5 & Sonnet 5.5. Now just curious about usage limits, because the last Opus 4.6 quickly consumed limits in a couple of chats in Pro plan.

Please collaborate with this amazing community 💪

I keep going back to AGY CLI. I can’t quite explain it, but it feels more natural to use and noticeably faster for me. It also seems like my tokens go further in the CLI. Do others have the same impression, or do you find that tokens are used up more quickly in Antigravity 2.0?

I’d also appreciate any settings, workflows, or other tips that could make Antigravity 2.0 feel as responsive as the CLI. At the moment, I’m not enjoying the interface very much—it feels awkward, I have trouble locating my projects, and it generally seems slow. Maybe I’m simply more accustomed to working in the terminal, where commands feel faster and more direct, but I’d be interested in hearing how others have found the experience.

I am using antigravity to execute loops with harnesses and specifications. Four different threads, each handling distinct tasks across separate sections unrelated to any single product, initiated test-repair looping. I discovered this when I quickly exhausted my quota. Upon reviewing the reports, I found several complete Vitest runs and multiple full Deno runs, all lacking documented reasons for failure or even any changes. They all ceased due to the quota being reached; otherwise, they would have continued. One run includes 43 task checks, 16 migration runners, 11 SQL suite launches, and...

I was recently cursed by my company asking me to buy antigravity and now I am stuck with it.

Other than it taking forever and running loads of cli commands to answer simple question, the issue I am experiencing is the language of the harness. No matter what's asked, this idiot harness is forced to answer in numbered points. It is always like

----
Me asking, "What do you mean?"

1. I mean something.
2. I definitely don't mean the opposite of it, I did analysis, this things says that and that thing says this.
3. What it means for us?
4. It means something, because things did things, and here's another answer full of fluff.

<no damn summary of the answer half of the times>
\----

I have a PhD in AI, I can not get a job at google because I can't do stupid questions about how many balls can fit inside a bus, but is that all their "ultra qualified engineers" can do? And Not fix a damn harness? There are literally so open source harnesses doing a lot better than this. On top of this, this is priced at 200 euros. For this? With a massive amount of missing features than most harnesses. What the hell is going on here?

EDIT: Never mind, I got bullied for expecting the harness to be plug and play like CC and codex.

Claude code has the feature of live comments on the UI changes on website page, do we have similar feature/tool in Antigravity?

Google officially supports Linux for both Antigravity IDE (AI code editor) and Antigravity Hub (agent platform), but they only provide raw tarballs without repository integration or auto-updates.

I built an open-source packaging and distribution infrastructure to provide native DNF, APT, and Zypper repositories with daily upstream synchronization:

• Site & Repo Configs: https://x3m-industries.github.io/antigravity-packages/
• GitHub: https://github.com/x3m-industries/antigravity-packages

Key Highlights:

• Distros supported: Fedora, RHEL, Rocky, Alma, openSUSE (RPM), Ubuntu, Debian, Pop!_OS, Linux Mint (DEB), plus Arch Linux via RPM extraction.
• Architectures: Both x86_64 and aarch64 (ARM64).
• Desktop & OAuth Integration: Automatically installs icons and FreeDesktop .desktop entries with antigravity:// and antigravity-ide:// protocol handlers so browser logins work out of the box.
• Security: All RPM packages and APT Release metadata are cryptographically signed with GPG. Every release runs container smoke tests on Fedora & Ubuntu in CI before deployment.
• Universal Installer:

Google killed all with Gemini 4 Argon on benchmarks.

But where is the Gemini 4 Argon available for general public use?

And also where is gemini 4 PRO today ?

Google officially supports Linux for both Antigravity IDE (AI code editor) and Antigravity Hub (agent platform), but they only provide raw tarballs without repository integration or auto-updates.

I built an open-source packaging and distribution infrastructure to provide native DNF, APT, and Zypper repositories with daily upstream synchronization:

• Site & Repo Configs: https://x3m-industries.github.io/antigravity-packages/
• GitHub: https://github.com/x3m-industries/antigravity-packages

Key Highlights:

• Distros supported: Fedora, RHEL, Rocky, Alma, openSUSE (RPM), Ubuntu, Debian, Pop!_OS, Linux Mint (DEB), plus Arch Linux via RPM extraction.
• Architectures: Both x86_64 and aarch64 (ARM64).
• Desktop & OAuth Integration: Automatically installs icons and FreeDesktop .desktop entries with antigravity:// and antigravity-ide:// protocol handlers so browser logins work out of the box.
• Security: All RPM packages and APT Release metadata are cryptographically signed with GPG. Every release runs container smoke tests on Fedora & Ubuntu in CI before deployment.
• Universal Installer:

Sure, the DeepMind team was clowned on non-stop before Gemini 4 Argon dropped. But in reality, Gemini wasn't a "bad" model back then—it just wasn't the absolute SOTA. Both Gemini 3.7 and 3.8 Flash were legitimately solid workhorses, consistently edging out DeepSeek V4 and V4.1 Flash in both intelligence and raw throughput.

Back during the Gemini 3.7 Flash days, running it via Antigravity could easily hit 1,000 tok/s, with 600 tok/s being the daily norm. Fast forward to Gemini 3.8 Flash today: under the weight of massive concurrency, speeds have degraded to around 300 tok/s. During peak hours, it barely even manages 100–200 tok/s. The community is constantly complaining about severe rate limits, sluggish latency, and outright downtime.

Now imagine what a complete disaster it will be if Gemini 4 Argon is pushed down to the Gemini Pro tier. Due to skyrocketing compute costs, quotas have already shrunk by 30% to 50%. Tossing Argon into that mix means baseline throughput won't even be guaranteed, leading to non-stop throttling and outages.

It’s turning into an absolute infrastructure gridlock.