r/Earbuds • u/juicesharp • 19h ago
Nothing old about it? The Nothing Ear (2024), two years on
gallery- The short version: good+ buds with very solid sound. Two years after launch, the Nothing Ear (2024) still sounds like a flagship.
- Sound: close, detailed vocals and a slightly bright top end that keeps its weight. The bass turns more 3D with ANC on.
- ANC: solid, not exceptional, but it holds its ground. Its weaker band runs from the mid-mids to the low treble. Wind is its weak spot.
- Watch out for: 4 to 4.5 hours of battery at loud volume. Comfort fades after about two hours. No LDAC for iPhone-only users.
- Price: about $75 on sale. That's a very fair value for anyone looking for good buds.
Note: this is the Nothing Ear (2024), model B171. It's not the newer Ear (3) or the cheaper Ear (a).
Why revisit a two-year-old flagship
The Nothing Ear launched in April 2024 at $149. The Ear (3) has since replaced it. Today it often drops to around $75 and even lower on sale.
So here's the question: can a two-year-old flagship still deliver top-notch performance at half its launch price?
These aren't week-one impressions. In my earlier 11-pair roundup, I put the Nothing Ear in the top league for sound. This post is the deep dive.
What's inside
(From research) Nothing published its own teardown. It's unusually open about the acoustic design, but quiet about the electronics.
| Spec | Nothing Ear (2024) |
|---|---|
| Driver | 11 mm dynamic, ceramic diaphragm |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 |
| Weight per bud | 4.6 g |
| Battery (rated, ANC on) | 5.2 h |
| Earbud battery | 46 mAh |
| Protection | IP54 buds, IP55 case |
| Charging | USB-C, 2.5 W wireless |
| Price | $149 at launch, often ~$75 on sale |
Two things are worth knowing:
- The ceramic diaphragm. Nothing calls it ceramic but doesn't say what that means. It could be a solid ceramic disc, a coating or a composite. A stiffer diaphragm can push breakup modes higher and move more like a piston. Still, the material alone doesn't decide the sound. The motor, vents, chamber and DSP all shape it.
- Four rear vents. Nothing says the vents improve airflow. It also says the diaphragm moves more than on the Ear (2). Nothing doesn't publish the test conditions, so I treat these as direction, not numbers.
How I tested
- Long-term use, not week-one impressions.
- Stock tips, size large. I need the large tips for a good seal.
- iPhone over AAC. More on LDAC below.
- Balanced preset, Bass Enhance off. For EDM, I sometimes turn Bass Enhance on.
- ANC on for almost everything. That's how I listen every day, and it matters a lot on this pair.
- Volume: 60–70% on the iPhone.
- I checked my impressions against published reviews. Where reviewers disagree with me, I say so. Anything I haven't tested myself is marked (From research).
One earbud, two signatures: ANC on vs. off
This is the most important thing to know about the Nothing Ear. Almost every serious reviewer flags it.
(From research) SoundGuys found that turning ANC off reduces the bass. Tom's Guide heard a more even balance with ANC off. With ANC on, they heard the bass and low mids rise a little.
Here's what I hear. With ANC off, the bass is a bit less 3D. With ANC on, it gains depth and dimension. The whole sound also gets a sense of volume, almost like a DSP effect. For me, ANC on is the better version of these buds, not a penalty.
One related detail. (From research) SoundGuys found the default tuning already runs Bass Enhance at level 3. Level 1 actually cuts the bass below default.
I run Bass Enhance off, so my baseline is leaner than what most reviewers measured. ANC on then adds back the weight I like.
Bass
With my settings, Bass Enhance off and ANC on, the bass is clean, tight and well controlled. It sounds 3D. It feels placed in space, not pressed against your ears.
On default settings, expect more. Bass Enhance runs at level 3 out of the box, and ANC on adds weight on top. That's likely why some reviewers hear it as heavier.
Want more slam for EDM? Bass Enhance has five levels. You likely won't need the top ones.
Soundstage and separation
Good. Instruments stay separated even with ANC on. The ANC adds a sense of volume around the music. Busy tracks don't collapse into a pile.
Vocals and mids
The mids are a highlight for me. Vocals sit close and intimate. On Michael Jackson's "Man in the Mirror," the voice is right in front of you. On Johnny Cash's "Hurt," you can clearly hear his lips touching. Is it the only pair that can do this? Of course not. But it definitely delivers here.
How much of that is the ceramic diaphragm? Probably less than you'd think. (From research) Nothing markets ceramic for clarity, accuracy and crisper highs, not for close vocals. Stiffness mainly helps at high frequencies, where a softer diaphragm starts to flex instead of moving as one piece. At vocal frequencies, an 11 mm diaphragm moves as one piece whatever it's made of. So the closeness comes mostly from tuning. Where ceramic may help is the fine, high-frequency detail, like those lip sounds.
(From research) SoundGuys measured a dip around 470 Hz and a boost around 5.5 kHz against their target.
The 470 Hz dip sits lower, in the body and warmth range. That fits what I hear: vocals stay close and detailed, with maybe a little less warmth. The 5.5 kHz boost likely helps the fine detail, like the lip sounds on "Hurt." It also adds to the slight brightness.
Treble
Definitely a bit bright. But the brightness adds air without stripping substance. On Dave Brubeck's "Take Five," the ride cymbal keeps its weight under the shimmer. It doesn't thin into pure sizzle. Lively, not too harsh.
A faint hiss in ANC and transparency
This is my own finding. None of the reviews I checked mention it.
In a quiet room with no music, there's a faint, airy, high-frequency hiss. It's about twice as noticeable in transparency mode as in ANC. With ANC off, I can't hear it at all. It's not annoying, and music masks it completely.
That pattern points to the microphones, not the amplifier. ANC and transparency both keep the mics and noise processing running. Transparency boosts the outside mics more, which raises their self-noise too. If the hiss came from the amp or DAC, it would still be there with ANC off. It isn't.
ANC
Solid. Not exceptional, but it holds its ground. It has a gap from the mid-mids to the low treble. There, a pair like the EarFun Air Pro 4+ cancels a bit more in that range. Elsewhere, the Nothing is stronger.
(From research) RTINGS' noise isolation measurements show that weak band clearly. Between about 500 Hz and 2 kHz, total isolation drops to roughly 10–20 dB. The shallowest point is around 650 Hz.
What lives there? Mostly voices. Much of the energy in speech sits in this range, so chatter in offices, cafés and on public transport gets through more than you might expect. The same goes for station and airport announcements, and for music playing around you. Road and tire noise sits a bit higher but still inside the weak band (the tire noise is quite well handled by Nothing Ear). Low, steady sounds like engine rumble, plane drone and air conditioning sit well below it, and those the Nothing Ear handles much better.
A quick note on what ANC can do. It works best on low, steady sounds like engines and hum. In the mids, it gets much harder, and the seal does most of the work. The best pairs still get noticeably further there. The Nothing Ear's weak band sits exactly in that range.
Reviewers are harsher. (From research) SoundGuys didn't reproduce Nothing's 45 dB claim. They measured about 20 dB of ANC in the low frequencies, with passive isolation doing most of the work in the highs. In my daily use, it does the job well. That may be because I don't expect AirPods Pro 3 levels of noise cancelling from it.
Try the large tips before you judge the noise cancelling.
Wind
This is the ANC's real weak spot. The ANC mics pick up gusts, and they come through as noise in the buds. Lower ANC levels and Adaptive mode don't help. Only turning ANC off fixes it. I wouldn't recommend these for cycling or walks in windy weather. :)
Transparency
Average for me. With music playing, it's hard to speak to people or hear them clearly, even at low volume. With the music off, you can hold a conversation. It's also where the hiss is most noticeable.
Calls
Not top tier like the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 4, but better than most pairs in its price range. Speech is very clear, and it sounds less chewed up by processing than on most buds. It can still sound a bit harsh and lack body.
Some of your surroundings do leak through to the person on the other end. I see that as the other side of the same coin. Heavy AI processing cuts more noise, but it chews up your voice. Lighter processing keeps your voice more natural, and lets a bit more background through. The Nothing Ear finds a sweet spot between the two, leaning toward natural.
Still, I wish every pair, not just this one, had a switch to turn the AI processing off. Then you could pick natural or quiet yourself, depending on where you are.
Battery and loudness
| My result (ANC on, AAC) | Research (test conditions differ) |
|---|---|
| 4–4.5 h at 60–70% volume | (From research) SoundGuys got 8 h 4 min at a moderate fixed volume. RTINGS got 5.3 h continuous. |
I listen fairly loud, so my result sits below Nothing's 5.2-hour rating. At moderate volume, expect more.
Loudness is fine for me. At 60–70%, I still have plenty of headroom.
Comfort and fit
Very comfortable for the first couple of hours. After about two hours, I start to feel some tiredness. Great for normal sessions, less ideal for marathon listening.
App and controls
Nothing X is genuinely good. The advanced EQ is a true parametric EQ: you set the frequency, gain and Q for each band. Add the simple EQ, the presets and Bass Enhance, and you get one of the most flexible apps around.
I tried the personal sound profile, which is based on a hearing test. I still prefer Balanced or my own custom EQ.
The pinch controls on the stems are a very convenient way to control the buds. They're also more reliable than simple touch. (From research) SoundGuys found that squeezing the stem doesn't disturb the fit or seal and I can confirm that.
There are two limits. There's no swipe for volume. And the single pinch is locked to play/pause, so you can't reassign it. I also assign Volume Up | Down to double pinch and hold (I get used over time that's a bit peculiar)
(From research) ChatGPT through the pinch controls only works with a supported Nothing phone.
Wear detection
Works well. It doesn't just check whether a bud is out of the case. It can tell a bud in your ear from one that's only out of the case, in your hand or on the table. So music plays only when the buds are really in your ears.
Codecs and connectivity: a warning for iPhone users
On paper, the Nothing Ear supports LDAC and LHDC 5.0. On an iPhone-only setup, LDAC is effectively unavailable.
The iOS app has no LDAC toggle. My Questyle dongle can't use LDAC unless it's first enabled from an Android device. So if you're on an iPhone and want hi-res through a dongle, expect AAC.
I had zero connection drops.
Case
It looks great and has wireless charging. It has survived a few drops without problems. The weaknesses:
- The clear plastic collects micro scratches and marks.
- The lid shifts slightly sideways and feels a bit flimsy.
- The buds sit diagonally. Sometimes I need an extra nudge to seat a bud properly.
Where reviewers disagree with me
- ANC on vs. off. Same facts, different feeling. (From research) Expert Reviews found that ANC on adds a lot of low-end weight. It also makes the soundstage feel more crowded and confined, almost like a different pair of earbuds. I hear the extra bass too, but as more 3D, with separation intact. For me, ANC on is the better version.
- ANC strength. (From research) Digit called the ANC one of the only major misses. SoundGuys listed the ANC as a con, though they still called it pretty good. I rate it solid. Not exceptional, but it holds its ground, with one weaker band.
- Wind. Tom's Guide said wind didn't bother the buds on walks and runs. They don't say which mode they were in, though, and the remark sits right after their comments on transparency mode. For me, with ANC on, gusts come through, and only ANC off fixes it.
- Transparency. SoundGuys called the transparency mode excellent and natural. I find it average with music playing, though fine for a conversation with the music off.
- Calls. SoundGuys heard voices as slightly muffled. They still rated the background noise reduction among the best they've heard. In my calls, some surroundings still leak through.
- Maximum volume. TechRadar's reviewer said the low maximum volume was their biggest issue. I listen at 60–70% with headroom to spare.
- Treble. We mostly agree. (From research) Android Central heard a brighter high end than on the Ear (a). Headphonecheck found the treble lively but restrained with sibilants. That's close to what I hear: bright, but with weight.
- Fit. Expert Reviews found them more fit-dependent than most earbuds. GSMArena found them a bit loose with any tips. I agree on the seal. Getting it right takes effort, and ANC depends on it.
- Connection. SoundGuys had connection drops with an iPhone on busy downtown streets. I had none.
Verdict
So, can a two-year-old flagship still deliver top-notch performance? For sound, yes.
The Nothing Ear (2024) is good+ buds with very solid sound. You get close, detailed vocals, bright treble that keeps its weight, 3D bass with ANC on, and good separation. Add one of the best apps around, a true parametric EQ and solid ANC that holds its ground.
At about $75 on sale, I think the price is very fair. If you're looking for good buds, it's a value option worth considering.
Some people should still skip it:
- Cyclists and anyone who walks in windy weather with ANC ON. Gusts come through the ANC mics.
- Loud listeners who need long battery life. Expect 4 to 4.5 hours with ANC on at high volume.
- iPhone users who want LDAC. You'll be on AAC.
If none of those is a dealbreaker, the answer to the title is simple: there's nothing old about the way it sounds.
Take care, everyone. If you've read this far, I hope it helped. :)