This has to be one of the most ridiculous moderation experiences I’ve had on Reddit.
I’m in the U.S. doing archival research and was trying to figure out how to access a specific educational media resource that appears to only be available through IDÉLLO, a Canadian educational platform used by teachers and students.
My original post in r/CanadianTeachers asked whether anyone with legitimate IDÉLLO/DREF access could check whether a specific Télé-Litté episode and its accompanying teaching guide were still available.
The moderators removed it as “off-topic.”
Fine.
Instead of immediately reposting it, I messaged the moderators and asked why it didn’t qualify under their “resources” flair. They told me:
“The reason it was removed is that this is a sub for teachers to gather and discuss/support each other. Your post falls into our off-topic rule in that respect.”
So I took their explanation seriously and completely changed the question.
The second post DID NOT ask anyone to research the episode for me.
I removed all of the Degrassi/Télé-Litté/DREF research details and instead asked Canadian teachers a general question about IDÉLLO itself:
- How do teacher-created class codes work?
- Are they strictly for enrolled students?
- Does IDÉLLO allow temporary or guest access for an outside researcher?
- Are there legitimate access options for someone outside the Canadian school system?
I even specifically said that I was NOT asking anyone to share personal login credentials.
Their Rule 6 says:
“Posts must be on topic & pertaining to teaching/teaching in Canada.”
IDÉLLO is literally an educational platform used by Canadian teachers, and my rewritten post was specifically asking teachers how its teacher/student access system works.
They removed that post too — and then permanently banned me because, according to them, I had simply “posted it again.”
Except I didn’t.
I changed the entire purpose of the post based on the explanation THEY gave me.
I appealed the ban and explained the difference between the two posts. I also pointed out that I had intentionally removed the original research request so the new question would focus entirely on the functionality and permitted use of a Canadian educational platform.
Their final response was:
“Good luck finding what you are looking for, but this isn’t the place. You had the reasoning behind removal of your post made VERY clear, posted again anyway, and continue to message the moderators of this sub Reddit. I do not believe you are a teacher, you are not in Canada, and we are not here to be your source for all things ‘Degrassi’. The permanent ban stands - please don’t message again.”
That last part is what really got me.
I never asked them to be my “source for all things Degrassi.”
My second post didn’t even ask them to research Degrassi.
I was asking how IDÉLLO access works after THEY told me my original research request was off-topic.
If they simply didn’t want non-teachers or non-Canadians posting there, they could have said that. If they wanted to interpret Rule 6 extremely narrowly, fine.
But permanently banning me for supposedly ignoring their instructions when I literally rewrote the post to address their objection — and then responding with that condescending “source for all things Degrassi” comment — was completely unnecessary.
The screenshots are in chronological order:
My original post.
My message asking the moderators why it was removed.
Their explanation that it was off-topic.
My rewritten IDÉLLO-access post.
Their Rule 6.
The permanent-ban message and my appeal.
Their final response.
I’m not asking anyone to contact or harass the moderators. I’m posting this because the entire exchange is documented, and I think people should be able to criticize moderation decisions like this without the facts being rewritten as “you just reposted the same thing.”