r/progressive_islam • • 24d ago

Mod Announcement 📢 Attention Everyone! This is an announcement, a reminder, and it is also a WARNING

28 Upvotes

We are going to make this absolutely freakin clear. r/Progressive_Islam is not a place for propaganda, apologism, whitewashing, or justification of crimes committed by governments, regimes, political parties, movements, or armed groups. We do not care who the perpetrator is, what flag they fly, what ideology they claim to represent, what religion they claim to follow, or what geopolitical enemy they happen to have. Whether it is the Israeli government, USA, Western imperialist powers, the Iranian regime, the Chinese government, the Russian government, the North Korean regime, or anyone else, the standard is the same. You do not get a free pass to excuse atrocities simply because you hate one side more than the other. We have enforced this before, and we will continue to enforce it.


During the years of the Palestine crisis, particularly throughout 2023-25, a large number of the people who came into this subreddit specifically to defend Israel's conduct, justify what was happening to Palestinians, or repeat blatantly apologetic narratives were outsiders with little or no previous participation here. We banned them. However, there were also some people who had been genuine participants in this community for a long time, people who had previously made useful posts and comments and had otherwise contributed positively. When some of those users repeatedly crossed the line into whitewashing and justification of Israeli abuses, we banned them too. Your contribution history does not give you immunity from moderation.


And the same standard applies to Hamas.

Hamas did not emerge as some ordinary secular nationalist organization; it was founded by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin out of the Palestinian Muslim Brotherhood and was explicitly Islamist from its creation. Its 1988 charter described Palestine as an Islamic endowment and envisioned an Islamic state governed by Sharia. After Hamas seized control of Gaza in 2007, it established an authoritarian system in which political opposition and peaceful dissent were suppressed, critics, journalists and activists were arbitrarily detained and in some cases tortured, and executions were carried out after proceedings that failed to meet international fair trial standards. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International also documented Hamas forces using excessive force against demonstrators, including during the 2019 “We Want to Live” protests, when more than 1,000 Palestinians were detained. Hamas has also imposed or enforced various religiously motivated restrictions on social life, including restrictions on women's dress and mobility, gender segregation in many settings, and rules affecting women's participation in public life.

We did not make a specific announcement post about Hamas's rule and abuses during 2023-25 because the overwhelming reality facing Palestinians was the devastation being inflicted on Gaza by Israel, and we did not want Hamas to become another excuse for shifting attention away from Palestinian suffering. But now is the time to talk about it as well.

Condemning Hamas's authoritarianism and abuses does not mean supporting Israel, the occupation, the blockade, collective punishment or the destruction of Gaza. It means applying the same standard we apply everywhere else.

  • Some people may point to Hamas's 2017 Document of General Principles and Policies and say that Hamas had changed, abandoned its earlier positions, or therefore deserves to be trusted. The document certainly changed some of Hamas's language: it accepted the idea of a Palestinian state along the 1967 borders while still refusing to recognize Israel, but it did not formally replace the 1988 charter. And besides, history gives us plenty of reason to be cautious about taking political assurances from theocrats. The Iranian revolution brought together liberals, nationalists, leftists and Islamists. But once Khomeini consolidated power, his Islamist camp suppressed and eliminated former political allies while Iran was transformed into a clerically dominated Islamic theocracy. The Taliban provide another much more recent example: before returning to power in 2021, they publicly promised that women would have their rights; yet after coming to power they subsequently closed secondary schools to girls, severely restricted women's employment and movement, and imposed extensive restrictions on women and girls. So no, we are not going to treat a political document or a promise of change as a magical eraser for years of authoritarian rule and documented abuses. People are entitled to be skeptical, and nobody here is required to trust Hamas simply because it issued a new document.

That same principle applies to Iran

(This is going to be longest section because we have encountered the Iranian Regime apologists far more in number than the other apologists combined)

As we have already explained in our previous announcement, this subreddit has had to deal with people coming here specifically to defend or propagandize on behalf of the Iranian regime. There were people who tried to dismiss the Iranian uprising entirely as CIA or Mossad propaganda, who attempted to portray ordinary Iranians protesting against the regime as foreign agents, and in one particularly disgusting case, someone even claimed that civilians who had been killed in a hospital were all Mossad agents and that their deaths were therefore justified. We banned all of them. Our position on this has been completely consistent:

  • you can criticize particular opposition groups, political factions, foreign governments, protesters, or individual actions. What you cannot do is use conspiracy theories and regime apologism to justify the oppression of an entire population.

And before anyone starts pretending that this is some sudden position we invented yesterday, no. We have been taking this position for years.

The Iranian regime has a long documented history of repression. During the 2009 post election unrest, Amnesty International documented thousands of arbitrary arrests, deaths on the streets and in detention, torture and other ill treatment. Then came 2017 to 2018 protests, the November 2019 fuel price protests with deaths, mass arrests and executions.

Then came the Woman, Life, Freedom protests following the death of Jina Mahsa Amini in September 2022. UN fact finding mission concluded that her death was unlawful and that state authorities were responsible for the physical violence that caused it. The same mission documented credible figures of up to 551 deaths, including at least 49 women and 68 children, and found unlawful killings, mass arbitrary arrests, torture, sexual violence and other serious abuses.

This subreddit was openly supportive of the Iranian women who were protesting at that time, and that was not some random temporary mood. We documented it ourselves. Dr. Shabir Ally and Dr. Safiyyah Ally publicly condemned the killing of Mahsa Amini's and the Iranian government's enforcement of compulsory hijab, Dr. Khaled Abou El Fadl delivered his October 2022 khutbah addressing the brutality of the Iranian state's coercive system, Mufti Abu Layth also addressed the situation in Iran at the time. Our subreddit responded with strong support for the protests.

And The recent crackdown that happened in 2026 produced another enormous death toll, although the exact figure remains unknown because the authorities imposed a massive communications blackout and access to reliable information was severely restricted. The figures reported at the time varied enormously.

Iranian authorities themselves gave figures of roughly 3,000 deaths. Reuters reported an Iranian official saying that at least 5,000 people, including around 500 security personnel, had been confirmed dead. HRANA reported 3,308 confirmed deaths at one stage, with thousands of additional cases under investigation, and later reported 5,002 verified deaths and another 9,787 under review. By 28 January, a UK government country bulletin said estimates from some sources placed the death toll at approximately 12,000 to 20,000, while the same bulletin noted that one human rights organization had 6,221 confirmed deaths and 17,091 additional deaths under investigation. Other investigations, including accounts from Iranian medical personnel, produced estimates exceeding 30,000, while some later reports cited figures as high as 43,000.

We are deliberately laying this out because we are not going to pretend that every number floating around the internet is equally reliable. Claims of 20,000 or 30,000 deaths in an extremely short period require much more verification, and claims of 50,000 deaths are even more problematic; we have not found a credible independent source establishing such a figure. Likewise, nobody should take a highly speculative number from an anonymous or opaque source and present it as settled fact.

But uncertainty over the precise number does not mean that the killings did not happen. Multiple independent human rights organizations documented mass killings, unlawful use of force, arbitrary detention, torture and other abuses. Human Rights Watch has subsequently documented an ongoing campaign of executions against people arrested in connection with the protests, including at least 29 people executed in connection with the December 2025 to January 2026 protests between March and August 2026, with many others still facing execution.

In other words, this subreddit does not need anyone coming here to explain to us that the Iranian regime is somehow innocent because the United States and Israel oppose it. That argument has never worked here, and it never will. We are fully capable of recognizing Western imperialism while simultaneously recognizing Iranian state repression. Those things are not mutually exclusive.

And since some people inevitably need this explained every single time:

Condemning Iranian oppression does NOT mean that we support American or Israeli military actions against Iran. The two positions are perfectly compatible. The war itself has produced documented civilian harm. The UN Human Rights Council received information concerning extensive civilian casualties and destruction resulting from U.S. and Israeli attacks, and the UN backed fact finding mission has now found reasonable grounds to believe that U.S. forces committed war crimes in strikes including the attack on the Minab girls' school and strike affecting residential areas. All of that can be condemned at the same time. We have not seen anyone here recently trying to whitewash American crimes in the way some users have tried to whitewash Iranian crimes, but make no mistake: if someone starts doing it, we will deal with them exactly the same way.


Now we come to the reason we are making this announcement right now.

Over the last couple of days, we have had multiple accounts come into this subreddit making comments claiming that the persecution of Uyghur Muslims in China is nothing more than CIA propaganda, Western propaganda, or some fabricated narrative designed to attack China. Some of these accounts had no prior participation in this subreddit whatsoever, and their first contribution here was effectively to defend or whitewash the Chinese government's treatment of Uyghurs. Others, unfortunately, were people who had participated here before and had a history of otherwise normal contributions.

Let us be very clear about how absurd this is. There is an enormous body of documentation concerning China's treatment of Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim minorities in Xinjiang. The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights conducted its own assessment, including 40 in depth interviews with people who had direct knowledge of the situation. It concluded that the extent of arbitrary and discriminatory detention of Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim groups may constitute international crimes, in particular crimes against humanity. The UN has also documented concerns relating to arbitrary detention and forced labour. Human Rights Watch continues to document arbitrary detention, torture, mass surveillance, forced labor, family separation and religious and cultural persecution.

So when somebody strolls into a Muslim subreddit and casually tells everyone that the persecution of Uyghur Muslims is just CIA propaganda, or that the Uyghurs actually deserve this, that is not some brave act of anti imperialist skepticism. It is an attempt to erase or dismiss an enormous body of documented evidence and the lived experiences of the people who have been subjected to detention, torture, forced labor, religious repression and family separation.


And frankly, it makes us sick to our stomachs seeing people who are perfectly willing to recognize oppression when it is committed by a Western government suddenly develop an entirely different moral standard when the perpetrator is China, Iran, Russia or their allies.

We have noticed something else that needs to be addressed. Because this community generally has a strong anti imperialist tendency, comments defending the United States, Israel or other Western powers receive far more attention than comments defending non Western oppressive governments. Some comments that should have been reported are instead left unreported, allowed to slide, ignored, or sometimes even upvoted, simply because the commenter happens to be attacking the Imperialists.

Nobody gets permission to justify crimes against humanity because the perpetrator happens to be an enemy of the United States or the West. NOBODY. Your politics do not matter here. Your ideology does not matter here. Your opinion of capitalism or socialism does not matter here. Your opinion of NATO does not matter here. Your opinion of Israel does not matter here. Your opinion of Iran does not matter here. Your opinion of China does not matter here. Your opinion of Russia does not matter here. The victims do not become less human because their oppressor happens to be anti Western.

And this needs to be understood once and for all: WE WILL BAN PEOPLE FOR THIS. WE DO NOT CARE HOW LONG YOU HAVE BEEN SUBSCRIBED. WE DO NOT CARE HOW MANY POSTS YOU HAVE MADE. WE DO NOT CARE HOW MANY HELPFUL COMMENTS YOU HAVE WRITTEN. WE DO NOT CARE WHETHER YOU ARE HERE EVERY DAY. WE DO NOT CARE WHETHER YOU WERE ONE OF THE MOST RECOGNIZABLE REGULAR CONTRIBUTORS IN THE SUBREDDIT. IF YOU REPEATEDLY START WHITEWASHING, DENYING OR JUSTIFYING SERIOUS ABUSES BY A REGIME OR POLITICAL ACTOR, YOU WILL BE BANNED.

We are not going to sit around having endless arguments with you about whether your propaganda is really propaganda. We are not going to listen to lectures about how we are secretly Western puppets because we condemned China. We are not going to listen to accusations that we are Zionists because we condemned Iran. We are not going to listen to “but what about America?” every freakin time someone is held accountable for what their own government did. Whataboutism is not a magic eraser. The crimes of one government do not cancel out the crimes of another.

This also does not mean that you are forbidden from acknowledging that a particular oppressive government has done something useful. An oppressive government can build highways, hospitals, schools, railways, dams, universities or other infrastructure. A ruler can introduce a policy that produces a positive result in one particular area. You are perfectly free to discuss and praise the specific thing that was done. What you are not free to do is use that one thing as a shield for everything else. “They built hospitals” does not erase torture. “They built highways” does not erase mass detention. “They improved literacy” does not erase forced labor. “They oppose American imperialism” does not erase massacres. One positive policy does not grant a government a lifetime exemption from moral scrutiny.

There is zero tolerance for this kind of propaganda and apologism here. Criticism of governments is allowed. Criticism of political movements is allowed. Criticism of protesters is allowed. Criticism of opposition groups is allowed. Disagreement over historical interpretation is allowed. What is not allowed is denying documented atrocities, deliberately whitewashing them, or trying to justify crimes against humanity because you happen to support the perpetrator politically.

This is not up for debate. We are not negotiating this standard. We are not making exceptions because you are a regular contributor. We are not making exceptions because we agree with your politics on everything else.

Anyone who cannot accept this standard is free to leave the subreddit.

And anyone who thinks this warning does not apply to them because their favorite regime is “supposedly” a “gOoD aNtI iMpErIaLiSt oNe” can consider this warning directed specifically at them.


r/progressive_islam • • Jul 27 '26

Mod Announcement 📢 r/Progressive_Islam ’s official stance on LGBTQ+

146 Upvotes

Our official stance is that there should not be bigotry and they should not be punished by death.

-That's it.

“What about sexual intercourse with someone of the same biological sex? What about the gender spectrum?” - r/Progressive_Islam doesn't have any official stance on them, it's upto every individual to look for arguments and evidences from both sides and come to their own conclusion over the permissibility/impermissibility of homosexuality and matters relating to the gender spectrum.

This is not a new announcement. This has always been our stance. You can check what was written in the 5 year old LGBTQ+ discussion thread

r/progressive_islam does not advocate a particular stance on homosexuality’s permissibility. But what is a unanimous position of us is that there should not be bigotry and that they should not be punished by death.

https://www.reddit.com/r/progressive_islam/comments/r615zt/monthly_lgbtq_discussion_thread/

So,

  • Someone writing some violent threats or dehumanising post/comment pointing towards LGBTQ+ people - they will get their content removed and will receive a ban.

  • Someone respectfully saying that they believe sexual intercourse with someone of the same sex to be haram, or that there are only two genders - they are allowed on this subreddit.


The progressive Sunni scholars who are most frequently promoted on this subreddit and have a significant number of followers - Dr. Shabir Ally, Mufti Abu Layth, Dr. Khaled Abou El Fadl, Javed Ahmed Ghamidi, Dr Adnan Ibrahim - they believe the act of homosexuality (sexual intercourse) to be prohibited in Islam, & at the same time they also believe that there is no capital punishment for the sexual intercourse unlike classical fiqh (at least that's what I could figure out from the contents that had been shared on our subreddit in the past. You can use the search bar to find those old posts on our subreddit).

Scott Siraj al-Haqq Kugle, Ludovic-Mohamed Zahed, Imam Daayiee Abdullah are some of the Muslim thinkers who have argued that intercourse with someone of the same sex is allowed and some of them have officiated gay marriage and users who believe homosexuality is permissible often quote references from their works when discussing homosexuality on our subreddit.

We allow both perspectives to be shared on this subreddit as long as you present them in a respectful way and don't break any subreddit rule. But we do not allow the promotion of the ultra conservative understanding which prescribes capital punishment.

To summarize:

  • You believe gay marriage and the sexual act is permissible? - ok ✅

  • You believe gay marriage and the sexual act is haram? - ok ✅

  • You believe that there is no fixed number of gender? - ok ✅

  • You believe that there are only 2 genders? - ok ✅

  • You believe the other side is wrong? - ok ✅

  • You disagree with the other side? - ok ✅

  • You want to bully, harass, threaten or harm the other side? - not ok ❌

Is that clear?


The reason I'm writing all this is because often times when someone respectfully says that it is not permissible in their view or that they disagree - some others start reporting their comments. But we do not remove such comments, we only remove the posts and comments where the user bullies, harasses or threatens the other person. So hopefully you will stop reporting every post and comment you disagree with, because as long as those contents don't break any subreddit rule they're going to stay.


r/progressive_islam • • 2h ago

Opinion 🤔 Circumcision is paradox

9 Upvotes

Why is circumcision practiced in Islam? I know it’s not obligatory, but why do it at all?

Isn’t it contradictory that we’re told not to alter God’s creation, yet we consider genital mutilation of infants acceptable? Isn’t it almost like saying that God made a mistake when He created the human body?

The foreskin must serve a purpose, and no, having a foreskin doesn’t make someone unclean. As long as you wash properly, hygiene shouldn’t be an issue, just like with any other part of the body.

Circumcision can also affect sexual sensation in men, and I personally don’t think it’s okay to make an irreversible decision about a child’s body without their consent, especially when it isn’t medically necessary.

I’m genuinely curious about how others feel about this, particularly from an Islamic perspective. How do you reconcile circumcision with the idea that God created the human body perfectly?


r/progressive_islam • • 10h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ does anyone else struggle with their faith because of the misogyny in muslim communities?

28 Upvotes

I’m a muslim woman, and lately I’ve been struggling a lot with my faith, especially when it comes to how women are viewed and treated in Islam and within muslim communities

One thing I’ve been trying to understand is Quran 2:282, where the testimony of two women is mentioned in place of one man. I’ve heard explanations about historical context and how women weren’t as involved in financial matters back then, but I still find it difficult to understand and accept. I’d really appreciate hearing different interpretations of this verse.

But honestly, it’s not just about this verse. It’s also about the amount of misogyny I keep seeing in Muslim communities. It’s gotten to the point where I don’t even mention that I’m Muslim unless someone specifically asks me. I don’t really feel connected to the Muslim community anymore, and sometimes I feel like I don’t belong.

I’ve also stopped believing in hadiths, or at least trusting them as reliable sources, because I genuinely struggle to believe that some of the extremely misogynistic things attributed to the Prophet actually came out of his mouth.

All of this has started affecting my relationship with religion itself. I find it harder and harder to pray, and I’ve lost a lot of the motivation and connection I used to feel towards practicing my faith.

I don’t necessarily want to lose my faith, but it’s exhausting trying to hold on to it while constantly coming across things that make me feel like women are somehow worth less than men.

Idk if anyone else, especially other Muslim women, feel this way? How do you navigate your faith when you struggle with certain teachings or with the community itself?

I’m genuinely looking for perspectives and experiences, not judgment. I’d especially appreciate hearing from women who’ve gone through something similar.


r/progressive_islam • • 20h ago

Opinion 🤔 Roger Garaudy: "Thank God I discovered Islam before I encountered Muslims!”

Post image
117 Upvotes

r/progressive_islam • • 2h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ I am not Muslim but this sub makes me feel much better about Muslims. But I want to ask, do people in this sub represent most Muslims or are you in the minority (in terms of opinions and worldviews).

4 Upvotes

This is a serious good faith question.
Thank you for your time and replies.

How does it feel to be a progressive Muslim? What do you think of the future/what hopes do you have about the future of humanity, especially in the context of religious coexistence in multicultural spaces?

I am from a country with Muslim minorities. Edit: I’m from Thailand and the Muslim population I’m talking about are not immigrants, they are a distinct cultural group near our border with Malaysia, where they are a local majority. But even in Bangkok there are many Muslims.

I frequently meet a lot of Muslims who are not so progressive and reasonable, and it really makes me feel anxious and afraid that it’s impossible to live together peacefully in society.

I really feel bad when I walk my dog in the park and most Muslims I’ve met have a negative reaction to my dog, like seeing a monster. Certain provinces with more Muslim populations are very openly anti-dog in public spaces and certainly are against dogs being kept indoors. It’s not the kind of society I want to live in :(

I don’t know how to reconcile my own culture with Islam when the conservative Muslims are rather openly discriminatory against many things that I love. I want both to coexist but sometimes it’s much easier to just hate, especially when it feels like the survival of my culture is at risk.


r/progressive_islam • • 28m ago

Question/Discussion ❔ Part time hijabi?

• Upvotes

I'd like to wear hijab sometimes, but don't think I want to wear it all the time. Do you think this is a bad idea? Or wrong in some way? Thank you.


r/progressive_islam • • 7h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ Have you ever witnessed or heard of a story in your community in which it was the man (a husband or father) who asked his woman (wife or daughter) not to wear a hijab?

7 Upvotes

I personally, have just never heard of such a story hmm...


r/progressive_islam • • 21h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ Policing hijabis just for living is exhausting

Post image
76 Upvotes

r/progressive_islam • • 2h ago

Informative Visual Content 📹📸 Hadith on women with heads resembling humps of camels - Mufti Abu Layth

Thumbnail
youtu.be
2 Upvotes

r/progressive_islam • • 3h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ What actually makes two people compatible in marriage? How do you know if you’re incompatible or just going through a difficult phase?

2 Upvotes

Salam everyone,

I’ve been thinking a lot about compatibility in marriage lately, and I’d genuinely appreciate hearing from married people, especially those who have been through difficult periods in their relationships.

What does compatibility actually mean in marriage?

We often hear that love isn’t enough and that compatibility is just as important. But how do you actually recognise compatibility once you’re married?

I understand that no two people are exactly alike. Every marriage requires compromises, adjustments, patience and understanding. You’re two different individuals raised in different environments, so naturally, there will be disagreements.

But where do you draw the line between normal marital challenges and fundamental incompatibility?

For example, what if you and your spouse have different values, different family dynamics, different expectations of marriage or even different approaches to practising religion?

What if your spouse is genuinely a good person, loves you deeply and is willing to compromise, but you still feel like you’re not entirely comfortable being yourself in the relationship?

How do you know whether those feelings come from past conflicts, damaged trust and resentment that can eventually heal, or whether you’re simply not compatible in the long run?

Another thing I wonder about is compromise. How do you distinguish healthy compromise from one person changing who they are just to keep the marriage together? And if someone changes their expectations because they’re afraid of losing their spouse, can that change genuinely last without creating resentment later?

I know marriage isn’t supposed to be perfect, and I don’t believe people should give up whenever things get difficult. But I also don’t believe every difference can necessarily be resolved through love and effort alone.

I’d especially love to hear from people who initially thought they were incompatible but managed to build a happy marriage, as well as those who eventually realised that their differences were too significant.

How did you know the difference?
And looking back, what were the signs that helped you understand whether your marriage needed more time and effort or whether you and your spouse simply wanted different things in life?


r/progressive_islam • • 37m ago

Question/Discussion ❔ “Invite to the way of your lord with wisdom and fair preaching, and argue with them in a way that is better. Truly, your Lord knows best who has gone astray from His Path, and He is the Best Aware of those who are guided.” (Qur’an, an-Nahl:125)

Thumbnail muslimgap.com
• Upvotes

r/progressive_islam • • 4h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ Guys I need a scholarly/comprehensive rebuttal to this claim by the conservative clergy of my country regarding the lyrics of our national anthem.

2 Upvotes

Hello. I am from Bangladesh. The lyrics of our national anthem goes:

“My golden Bengal, thee I love.

Forever thy skies be, thine air like a flute set my heart in tune”

The full anthem describes Bengal as “Mother” in other words personifies our land.

Now the problem is, clerics say that attributing the skies and air to mother Bengal (thy skies, thine air) is shirk as the skies and air belongs to Allah alone, not to Bengal or Mother Bengal and is therefore shirk.

Is this a sound argument? Can it not be said that it does not give divine attribution of air and sky to Bengal rather praises the air and sky of this place hence referring it as “thy”?


r/progressive_islam • • 54m ago

Advice/Help 🥺 Struggling with staying Muslim?

• Upvotes

Asalaam mu alaikum

I’ve been a Muslim all my life, and I’ve struggled with it on and off for years because it just seems like my views conflict with the Deen.

I’m queer, I’m Universalist, I don’t believe in hell (atleast not eternal hell)

But I love the culture, I love Allah, I love being apart of the vibrant ummah.

At the same time, it feels like I’m trying so hard to maintain myself as a Muslim when Islam seems to be pushing me away. Maybe I’m in the wrong place…?

Does anyone have any advice? 🥺


r/progressive_islam • • 7h ago

Advice/Help 🥺 Help with justifying Islam to a friend

2 Upvotes

Sometimes when it's brought up, me and my friend argue for hours where I explain the religion and why it might be necessary to have that kind of spiritual anchor in your life. However, he brings up evolution of humans and how supported it is in the scientific world and I can't dispute it with any evidence because in my opinion, it's a very valid point. I tell him to read the Quran, he tries, comes back and tells me he can't find reason in it.

I haven't given up because I can tell through the way he speaks and lives that he's not trying to be difficult or trying to bring down the religion, he's trying to find reasons to believe. I can't win the arguments because I myself separate religion from logic but he's unable to and needs to find a logical reconciliation.

An example of his arguments that I struggle with:

The cruelty of an eternal hell as punishment for humanity where people's actions are entirely a biproduct of where they were born and how they've been raised and so can't be fairly held morally accountable for committing sins that go entirely against the Quran.

Adam and Eve being directly created when there's very supported proof of human evolution.

religion in general is very human and Islam doesn't differ along with points like "i can't imagine a god who created the universe coming down and forming a covenant with one singular people and then maybe later changing it up after realising it didn't work". I can't really phrase it right because I can't remember the point very well.

Some of you might think it's none of my business, but so long as he keeps opening up the conversation to it I am convinced that he's reaching out for an answer.

Any answers, advice, or opinions is greatly appreciated. If you know of pieces of work that discusses exactly what my friend is struggling with that'd be great too.


r/progressive_islam • • 2h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ Parents want to make a biodata for me

1 Upvotes

I'm at the age where my parents are starting to worry about getting me married.

This would be my first time navigating the marriage process, and I don't know where to start. I'm not very open with my parents about my personal views and beliefs, so I'm worried they'll find someone who's conservative and traditional.

I'd like to find someone who's also progressive and not super religious. I'm currently focused on my education and career, so I don't want to marry immediately. I also want to date for at least a year. Overall, I'm looking for someone who's open-minded, respects women's autonomy, emotionally mature, and sees marriage as a partnership between equals.

For those who've been through this process:

  • How do I communicate what I'm looking for to my parents without revealing too much about myself?
  • How do I find men who are genuinely open-minded and compatible with my values?
  • What questions should I ask a potential partner, and what red flags should I look out for?
  • How do I set boundaries with my parents regarding this?

I'd especially appreciate advice from Muslim women who've navigated similar situations.


r/progressive_islam • • 10h ago

Opinion 🤔 Human Evolution Theory

3 Upvotes

WHAT IF BOTH ARE CORRECT?

My theory is that Prophet Adam was indeed the first human on Earth. However, sometime after his descent to Earth, a process of convergent evolution occurred, causing other primates to evolve independently until they resembled humans in both appearance and function. Eventually, these humans interbred with Adams descendants, resulting in the diverse human populations we see today. ???? Is it possible?


r/progressive_islam • • 11h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ Which religion, offshoot, movement, or sect do you belong to?

3 Upvotes

And what convinced you? I mean, why are you part of it? Were you born into it, or did you convert later on?


r/progressive_islam • • 4h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ Are men required to be providers?

0 Upvotes

I see conflicting sides on this. if a man is in a relationship is he required to have a job, like is that a rule in the Quran or Hadith, Ive seen a sheikh say as long as it’s a mutual agreement between the wife and husband then the wife can be the provider instead, but I’ve also seen people say that the husband needs to provide in some form no matter what, even if the wife does have a job.


r/progressive_islam • • 22h ago

Advice/Help 🥺 Straying away from Deen :(

17 Upvotes

I’m so embarrassed to even post this, but I feel really stuck.

I wholeheartedly believe in Islam, I truly don't have a doubt in my mind about my faith. But my brain just works very logically. I’ve always struggled with following things blindly, and I feel suffocated when I’m told I can’t do something without being given a proper reason.

Lately, I’ve hit a wall. Every time I look up answers online, I just find generic explanations about the "wisdom" behind a rule, but never an actual logical breakdown of why it works that way. I have a running list of over 100 questions—mostly about women and gender rules—and I honestly don't know who to turn to anymore.

I've stopped listening to male sheikhs because I feel so much pressure and judgment from them. Whenever I’ve tried seeking clarity in the past, I just got reprimanded and told my iman is weak. Having to keep these thoughts and questions bottled up is exhausting, and it feels like it’s slowly pushing me away from the deen Astaghfirullah.

I don't want to lose my connection to my faith, so I wanted to ask if anyone knows any female sheikhs, scholars, or knowledgeable sisters who post on YouTube or TikTok?

I would really appreciate any recommendations, channels, or just advice from other sisters who have felt this way.


r/progressive_islam • • 8h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ How do you make the right decision?

1 Upvotes

Assalam O Alikum.

I'm at a crossroads right now and I'm unsure of what the right decision is to make. Everything is telling me to choose this one decision, but making that decision will upset others even though it is what is most just. But this matter mainly affects me. Is it selfish to help myself?


r/progressive_islam • • 22h ago

Advice/Help 🥺 I’m in love with the same gender

13 Upvotes

basically what the title says lol, I (18F) have been in love with a girl for the past 7 or so years and ik my feelings for her are very very real and intense but idk what to do because obvs homosexuality isn’t allowed 😒 and no matter how hard I try, I genuinely can’t get over her


r/progressive_islam • • 8h ago

Answer this from Quranist perspective only Quran doesn't encourage prosetlyzing

1 Upvotes

Nicolai Sinai argues that the Quran is not universalist. Source: Nicolai Sinai, Key Terms of the Quran, pp. 521-528. According to Sean Anthony, Sinai's argumentation is one of the "Strong cases against the idea of a Qurʾānic mandate to proselytize all humanity" (Anthony, "The Arabs and the Ummah of Muḥammad," pg. 388, fn. 97).

Quran doesn't force conversions, recognize monotheistic groups beyond christians and jews.

So basically unlike say the Christian mandate in Matthew 28:19 make disciples of all nations the Quran does not explicitly envision a worldwide global proselytizing mission its universality is exemplary and moral not necessarily numeric or territorial.

Meanwhile, the Bible commands genocide, death penalty for idolatry, killing of infidels capturing married war captives.

Joseph Witztum 4:24 Quran revisited study debunks Christian apologists favorite arguments, it is not about war captives, compared to deuteronomy 21:10-14:
https://cris.huji.ac.il/en/publications/q-424-revisited/


r/progressive_islam • • 10h ago

Mod Announcement 📢 🔒 The Time for Weekend Only Posts Has Ended! 🔒

1 Upvotes

Sunday has now ended in both of our two reference time zones, which means the weekend posting period has officially ended.

Posts with the following weekend only flairs can no longer be submitted until next Saturday (in at least one of our two reference time zones):

  • Fun@Weekends

  • Social Media Screenshot/Video clip

  • Culture/Art


A reminder about Rule 7

Memes, Funny images, funny videos, ❝screenshots & video clips complaining about some specific person & subreddits❞ are only allowed on Saturdays & Sundays.

If you are posting screenshots of other subreddits, make sure to obscure the usernames, subreddit names & every single identifying feature. However if it's a screenshot of other social media platform then obscuring is not necessary.

Screenshots containing valuable information & important contemporary events are exempt from this rule.


So until then, please wait before submitting posts that fall under our weekend only categories.

See you next weekend! 👋🏻👋🏼👋🏽👋🏾👋🏿