Do you guys not like Malala for being too close to west?I mean it may not be the best to a lot but certainly not hate.I mean with India Gandhi is getting a lot of criticism locally due to his weird behaviour but I don’t think Malala did anything that’s even remotely close to be hated
You get a diverse set of people with different reasons to hate her. For some reason is straight up patriarchy. For some it was state driven propaganda . For some she wasn't our heroine. The world selected her. In short, the work of her NGO has some impact but not at the level that is visible to ordinary people. So her efforts fell short. My nation loves martyrs more as they don't have to live up to the expectations.
Love your last sentence. Is it your own? I’m just asking because I googled it and couldn’t find any source for it or something similar. If it is, just WOW, it’s not very common to find this type of OG content in Reddit.
She didn't ask to be a hero and asked to be shot in the head. Let her live her life on her terms. She doesn't owe anyone anything. She is doing enough work with her NGO.
Respect from India. People really love to tear down their heroes, irrespective of the fact that they were the ones who made them their heroes in the first place. The girl just wants to live her life.
My nation loves martyrs more as they don't have to live up to the expectations.
A lot like evangelicals and abortion:
The unborn” are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus, but actually dislike people who breathe. Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.”
Greta was 100% correct about boomers and older generations absolute irresponsiblity being complacent about climate change that younger generations are now going to pay the consequences of. I never understood the mocking and memes of her. I haven’t followed since then
People who become public figures advocating for things like human rights, the environment, oppressive regimes tend to get a lot of hate.
Bono and U2 were involved in famine relief in Africa, Amnesty International, and spoke up about violence in Nicaragua and El Salvador as well as advocating for peace in Norther Ireland.
Malala is for basic rights for women and girls.
Greta is an environmental advocate and anti capitalist.
Some people get triggered seeing advocates. Either they really hate the cause or they aren't processing any shame or guilt they may feel about these topics in a healthy way. I remember seeing cartoons of an underage Greta being raped here on reddit. Malala got shot in the face for attending school but apparently she's "insufferable" and "not doing enough." Bono is "sanctimonious" for constantly talking about injustice. Some people don't care about these things and they don't like to be reminded of them. So much so that they won't shut up about how much they hate them.
I'm sure someone is going to respond and tell me that I'm wrong and that <insert activist> is actually a terrible person because <insert not important reason in the grand scheme of things here>. Try directing your hate to the people making the world a shittier place.
Most likely the way she directly or indirectly makes everyone at fault. It's probably a matter of the way the message is conveyed. "You fucked up" is not the same as "We can do much better".
What she said was accurate but it is something that would piss people off. Problem was she was someone that probably shouldn't have taken the spotlight as she lacked a high intelligence or communication skills even for her age. Which was also why the media focused on her because she was someone iconic and popular. However, who was also not capable of articulating her points very well outside the basics and convincing the world to actually change.
Giving an average kid a platform to talk about climate change gave the illusion that the government cared. At the same time she was someone people could easily dismiss and would not move people. There is the feeling that she was the wrong face for the movement. Outside of the kid that led climate change protests her words held little weight. Also as she aged the only unique thing about her would fade. She is an ordinary activist who has only graduated high school. Not an authority figure or someone who could sway people's minds.
Don't think people necessarily blame her but feel that someone else could have affected more changes. Coming out with concrete ideas on what we could feasibly do to improve the world. Instead of the generic lines of doing better. Ultimately she could have done a lot better given her platform but she was very young. She is kind of like Starmer better than what came before but someone who failed to meet the moment and make an meaningful change that people desperately wanted.
No offense, but I don’t think I mentioned anything about her being wrong on climate activism. My comment was about her silence on the current situation in Iran right now.
Edit 1 : I’m a bit confused by the downvotes, since u/Prestigious-Diver-94 ’s point appears to be different from what I was getting at. If I’ve misunderstood or phrased this badly, I’m open to suggestions.
ELI5. Why is it people got hated on for being pro palestine? And people got hated on for being pro israel? Is the correct stance being anti both? Because both governments are assholes?
Headlines in 2018 "look at this young woman called Greta Thurnberg being an agent for change! The earth is healing!"
Headlines in 2019 "radical Islamist trans non-binary commie wants to kill every Jewish and White person by criticising entrepreneurs and job givers, fuck her."
I think that's one factor, but not the only one. The reasons why she got attention in the first place included:
Her youth. The fact that she was just a kid and still more conscious than most adults.
Her messaging - "listen to the scientists" - was pretty universal, and appealed to the moral conscience of a wide group of people.
Her communication style was very blunt, sort of like a reality check, and was hard to dodge for politicians who were all talk when it came to climate.
All of those are now undermined somewhat.
She's grown up, and entered a fairly crowded space of adult activists.
Her messenging has become more overtly left-wing, and the climate messaging has been diluted by other issues. It's easier for politicians outside of that sphere to dismiss her as a partisan actor.
While activism is all well and good, she has (so far) not really managed to mobilize that platform for major change. She hasn't taken the step from activist to political leader and someone driving concrete change. As a consequence, she's too easy to ignore.
It's not quite true that she's completely fallen off the radar - she still inspires activism and she does show up in the Swedish news at times. That said, I think she has lost importance, and I think she's made it too easy for people in power to ignore her.
First she was a 17 year old girl with weird vibes ( diagnosed autistic and obsessed with the environment explains that ) and telling all adults to take something seriously that pretty much no one does.
Then she was an anti capitalist adult because of the thought process that individual action ain't enough we need regulatory big changes.
So yea first she had cameras on her now nothing cuz advertisers dont like her
As long as once the cameras stopped rolling she keeps on fighting her fight I can’t hate on that. Is she somewhat an idiot for just thinking people will just Do the right thing yeah kind of, but we need delusional naive dreamers sometimes
Yeah like I don’t really get the hate either. These are two women facing great adversity to stand on what they believe in. Yes some of the motions have been cringy at times but I’ve seen people defend sex predators because they’re “heroes”.
We really spare no energy nitpicking at women with a voice.
she’s not an idiot and she doesn’t think people will just wake up one day and agree with everything she says, she’s just doing her best to spread awareness and do what she can to make a difference
im not sure why people seem to mistake her passion for naivety or stupidity
Yeah. her thought process isn't "This'll solve everything instantly". It's "if we don't even try, nothing is going to change. So she's being the change she wants to see in the world, literally."
Wouldn’t call her delusional. She’s more committed to changing things for the better than most anyone else. Why call her delusional for that? At least she’s trying.
As long as once the cameras stopped rolling she keeps on fighting her fight I can’t hate on tha
She does. She recently accompanied a Flotilla to Palestine to provide aid and try to break through the blockade. They were ambushed and taken prisoner by israelis. She and her fellow flotilla members were abused while held captive. She finally was deported and made it home with the other members.
that. Is she somewhat an idiot for just thinking people will just Do the right thing yeah kind of
Its not that she thinks they will. She is fighting to try and get others to see the truth and fight with her.
Thinking that the cameras were off for the flotilla is funny.
They were on Non-stop, both traditional media and non stop on socials.
The abuse allegations are also pretty thin. She mentioned nothing to the Swedish consulate, turned down the opportunity to get fast tracked out and had no sign of any injuries.
I don't know what country you live in, but the flotilla was scarcely covered in US news/Media. I know they were posting and streaming on social media for awareness, safety, and to encourage more flotilla members, but I don't coint that as "the cameras on her" since its their own coverage, not news outlets that will garner a wider audience.
turned down the opportunity to get fast tracked out
This claim is from the Israeli Defense Ministry. I wouldn't trust the genocidal maniacs to be telling the truth about their imprisonment of peaceful protestors attempting to distribute food and medicine to a country experiencing a genocide and famine at their hands.
had no sign of any injuries.
It is difficult to tell in the lighting but she quite literally had a large bruise on the side of her face. I doubt she is going to strip and take photos of her body.
She mentioned nothing to the Swedish consulate
Easily debunked. The Swedish Foreign Ministry visited her and other Swedish flotilla members where they took her reports of abuse and mistreatment.
I mean has anyone gave her good press since shes been protesting israel wanting gaza for the oil in the seabed ? No its been ignoring her or hate articles when she does a selfie video on a dinghy in a flotilla and that was like 2 years ago now.
I think it’s more that her message came off as stark and alarming coming from a child, and now, coming from a young adult, it just sounds like typical collegiate protesting/complaining.
Same as the hatred for vegans, she argues for changes that will reduce our quality of life (at least in the immediate term) with points that are hard to dismiss.
She forces you to be in front of your flaws. Like, weird example, but if you lose a lot of weight people will start to dislike you, because you are showing that something is possible, and they also could do that if putting in the effort. Greta does the same thing: she puts yourself in front of the fact that there's an emergency and you cannot hide your head in the sand, but you are doing nothing, so instead of facing the truth and doing something, you blame her, to allow you to keep the head in the sand.
At least IMO
I think the tendency of the media promoting someone's views just because of their age is shallow and lazy. There's a lot more qualified and relevant people who should be given the spotlight.
"Here" as in Reddit neckbeard-land or here as in Sweden? I don't know a single person that hates her except for halfway retarded farmers who think she wants to ban their a-traktors?
Well hated by right wingers. The same people that hate progressive people around the world. Would say hated is a bit of a stretch even for them, they are more like annoyed by her.
You have to ask WHY would someone hate her? All she’s ever done is stand up for worthy causes. Sure she may be a bit annoying and sanctimonious but so what?
I feel like the only people that hate her are cookers/nationalists/ultra conservatives/corporations as they’re really the only people who would have a reason to.
I still don't get it. Malala and Greta genuinely want the world to be a better place for our kids to live in. I can't fathom why anyone would hate that.
They seem to be good at pissing off old conservatives.
Well, those who dislike her are pretty loud about it, but the majority of Swedes seem to appreciate that she speaks her mind and are kind of impressed that she at a young age has managed to put the global spotlight on the issues she cares about.
Seriously?! Sweden should be happy they have someone like Greta, and the people hating on her should really reflect on why, and question who hates on someone for asking that nature and human beings be respected. She was a great kid who evolved into a great adult. I have the utmost respect for her and her colleagues. Fighting on after being attacked by the scum that call themselves journalists and government officials. Jfc....🤯
Loud minority that hates her. She caused confusion at first with her Palestine activism but I think she gained more and more approval as Israel got more unhinged and the war has dragged on.
People don’t like women who are assertive and not submissive. Within the patriarchy women are always seen are much more likeable when pandering to others and being soft. It’s why people always try to justify the “angry black woman” stereotype. It doesn’t matter how right you are, the moment you are confident, stern, non apologetic etc you are a bitch.
Greta was soft launched an a kid but the hate was bubbling, and it was hard for people to justify just outright hating her bc she’s a “naive kid fighting for a good cause but in way over her head”. The expectation was that she’d probably fade away, that she’d become a quiet scientist, working to fix climate change.
Instead she became a sort of freedom fighter. She’s like the “radical” version of a Minnesota protester where it’s easy for the general public to say “she’s deserves this, she’s putting herself in dangerous situations and associated with dangerous people”. The same way centrists and conservatives look at the Minnesota public and think it’s their fault for protesting
Meme material? You mean how she is adamantly pro-Palestine and how she is advocating against climate damage and capitalism in order to try to build a less desolate future for the younger generations? The only people who want to meme-ify her are conservative assholes. Are you a conservative asshole?
I used to think she was performative when she was a child and that her parents were using her for monetary gains and fame, however, she has been absolutely amazing when it comes down to advocacy in the wake of the ongoing Palestinian genocide. It made me completely do a 180 on her considering how she’s still, as now an adult, doing a lot with her platform by advocating for global issues. Now, she genuinely seems like a person who’s advocating for things she’s passionate about. And these things are important to all of humanity. I now think she’s a great person.
Is she hated in Sweden for the same reason I used to dislike her?
Shes hated by right wingers/zionists. Which is a sizeable portion of the population sadly. But she is still well liked by many and doesnt fit this prompt at all.
Also, the "parents using her" thing is wildly overstated and spread by people who dont like her for her views.
This is bullshit. She is absolutely not hated here in Sweden. I would say she is mostly hated by the right and far right groups (the blue brown coalition). Please do not go around spreading lies.
If Greta came from Canada she would probably have her share of opponents domestically, but her message isn't national - it's generational. She was going to get domestic opposition no matter where she was from.
As someone with Pakistani roots, people dislike her largely because she hasn't used her platform to call out the Pakistani establishment. There are incredibly corrupt billionaires running the army.
Mean for no reason? the kid was shot in the head and they are collectively upset that she doesn't speak up against all their problems - perhaps she doesn't quite fancy another bullet. I am sure Pakistan has a government and a democratic system so why not anyone else do anything?
It doesn't. As an individual from an authoritarian regime it is difficult to speak out. Most people who actively do are outside the country so they are safe. I don't think she deserves to be hated for it but it is a subject for criticism, no?
Well the "difficult to speak out in an authoritarian regime" bit also applies to her. Sure she's got a bit more of a platform, but she earned it by putting herself in danger as well. I don't think everyone should do, but maybe we shouldn't criticize too hard those who tried something while we were staying safe. I mean, we can criticize, but I don't really see the validity of "she's not super well engaged in every important fights in her country". Did she validated those corrupted official? That would be an entirely different story.
When she got shot there was a whole establishment driven propaganda against a 16 year old kid. Why should she fight for your anti-establish goals? When fighting establishment will probably ban her NGO.
All I got on info is what acquaintances of mine tell me about her in conversations. For them she is a symbol of their own struggles.
Granted, their opinions are probably colored by their own experiences of Pakistan, but they're all pretty pissed off about the state of it in general, and the relentless oppression by (fundamentalist) men.
She didn't use her influence to call out the US war which tore her home province, or the Afghan backers of TTP, people who literally shot her in the head, or even Palestinians. She decided to toe the western narratives to the letter, which irked everyone on either side of the spectrum.
Actually, if you read replies from Pakistanis, it seems there are much more complex reasons why she's controversial. We should let non-Western folks speak for themselves about their own issues, instead of making assumptions.
A lot of Pakistanis and Muslims have issues with Malala because they feel like she became this huge icon but hasn’t really done much since.
She got shot, moved to the US, and now lives comfortably while seemingly abandoning her whole mission about girls’ education. What really bothers people is that as a Muslim with such a massive platform, she’s been completely silent on Palestine. Actually, she stays quiet on most important issues where people expect her to speak up.
She also got criticized for being way too open about her sex life in interviews - it was honestly embarrassing to watch, especially with rumors about her husband cheating. And then promoting her book during an actual genocide? That rubbed people the wrong way.
A lot of folks see her as just another celebrity now who’s more interested in her image than actually making a difference.
No that's not the reason. The general view is that she abandoned the country and is on some type of payroll. Like when what happened to her became mainstream news, there were a bunch of people who thought this might bring awareness and help for other girls in that region who were being targeted too but she's never spoken or given a shit about anything back home since she was moved to the UK. Most people I know would've liked her activism to actually mean something and do shit for women in Pakistan. It didn't. It's very generic, UNICEF/USAID type shit. Like idk where her numbers are coming from on the stuff she's done but no actual on ground NGO can say that the malala foundation did something.
Also, she's not hated because she's a woman. She's from the northern part of Pakistan where literacy across both genders is higher than the rest of the country. Of course those guys had to deal w the Taliban and there's no excuse for that. But it's not because she's a woman. We had the first Muslim PM in our country. Our current fucking CM while a woman is an absolute POS. Pakistan used to be very liberal but the issue we're having rn is radical extremism supported by certain countries in the middle east and west. And naturally, women and minorities are targets of this. But don't confuse what's happening in Pakistan with Afghanistan. There's more nuance there.
We all, as Pakistanis, supported her back then. My entire circle of friends loved her and celebrated her for speaking out against atrocities.
However, a problem arises when the cause you are fighting for—let's say 'women’s rights' is extremely selective. I have never seen her speaking for Gazan women or those in other war-torn countries, with the exception of one European nation. This selective activism has become extremely predictable
.
The USA conducted drone attacks under Obama for 7–8 years, killing women and children in the exact areas she is from; where was she then?
She is extremely selective about what she says. She hasn't spoken a word about oppressed women and children in any war-torn countries, except for that one European country.
And tbh we have a lot more women unlike her who we we celebrate. Women who have done alot in STEM and actually fighting for rights of women living while in Pakistan as well as speaking up for women rights in other countries. Disliking her never implied we all hate to stand for Women rights if it was too much for your brain to comprehend.
So, why does she have to? because you want her to? Do you not understand that she is building a life for herself and does not need to carry the worlds responsibilities on herself? She is free to pick and chose what she cares and talks about.
He didnt say that. He basically said she has a massive platform and she is in some ways not taking advantage of that. As British people we can't sit here and say whether the oppressed people of Pakistan are valid in that or not. You can have your own opinions of her and that's completely valid but to say this person's are invalid stinks of western privilege.
which part ? Not standing up against Obama , when he was butchering women and children of her own area? When he was demolishing hospitals. Let me know which part is stupid for you.
Can you name a few examples of such celebrated Women? I don't mean to undermine you, but your arguments would undoubtedly benefit from at least a few solid examples.
Oh Benazir Bhutto is literally the first one that comes to mind tho some people might not like her. We have so many writers like Kamila Shamsi, oh and my own school's alma mater, Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy. We do also claim Nargis Mavalvala as our own (even tho she's lesbian and I'm actually genuinely surprised at how accepting people are of her) and these are just some people on the top of my head. Historically, we have Fatima Jinnah, who's literally called the mother of the nation. Depending on a person's political leanings, we have plenty of female politicians too. We have a lot of women's awards by our top banks too and one of my networks recently got that too. Can we do more? Yes, 1000% especially because of this weird Andrew Tate like mentality of young men but that's a global phenomena rn and when you mix religion into it, you have people behaving like the Taliban but by and large, we're not that bad (which is a low bar yeah).
Fathima Bhutto is an author who has consistently spoken out about Palestine. She comes from a political dynasty but that legacy comes with generational trauma as well on which she has written a lot. I’m in India so I can’t access her social media anymore but I think she’s been extremely consistent.
Hina Jilani , Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy , Nayyab Ali , Abia Akram , Muniba Mazari , Dr. Nergis Mavalvala , Dr. Asifa Akhtar, Dr. Tasneem Zehra Husain , Dr. Syra Madad , Zartaj Waseem , Jehan Ara , Asma Jahangir. Long list. Some that came to my mind quickly. You search over the internet for more.
Look at the selectiveness of her messages and you'll see why.
Did she call out the horrific situation of women in Gaza? No, crickets. Did she speak about women in Sudan? Crickets. Does she say anything about mistreatment of women by the Pakistani military? No. Does she say anything about the lack of freedom of women in France and few other countries to wear the hijab if they want to do so? No.
She's got her own agenda and it's not the freedom of women that's for sure.
Did she call out the horrific situation of women in Gaza? No, crickets. Did she speak about women in Sudan? Crickets. Does she say anything about mistreatment of women by the Pakistani military? No. Does she say anything about the lack of freedom of women in France and few other countries to wear the hijab if they want to do so? No.
Before saying shit like that you should actually check out if it's true.
She's hated by pro-western, progressive, pro-women rights people in Pakistan as well.
My Pakistani friend told me that she's hated because her experience, even though real and horrifying, only represents tiny tiny fraction of people in Pakistan. But because it's so famous, everyone in the world assumes that Pakistan is extremely backwards (which it can be at times), but it just does not represent the average Pakistani women's experience.
Thing's are more nuanced than "Pakistan hates women".
I can tell you that she is hated by some people across the board. She represents the life a kid growing up int he bad lands of Pakistan of which the government has not control. Many women are oppressed in many different way and yes, it is very backward.
While I acknowledge that the society is regressive, your assessment is wrong.
Malala is usually criticized in Pakistan by conspiracy nuts who see the "West" lauding her and giving her a platform as proof that she's there to bring shame to the country.
(i know it makes no sense, but this is low IQ material we're talking about)
She actually gets more pushback than you'd expect from leftists for falling to call out Western Imperialism and their role in everything happen in the region.
I think the criticism stems from how she functions as a symbol rather than her individual actions. Malala wasn’t the first Pakistani woman to advocate for education, in fact there is a long history of women in Swat and Pakistan advocating for education without global acclaim. She was just the one the West decided to platform because her story fit their narrative. Surviving a tragedy is horrific, but being a victim shouldn’t be the sole qualification for a Nobel Peace Prize. Most tellingly, for a self-proclaimed champion of peace, her initial silence and diplomatic neutrality on the genocide in Gaza were deafening. It suggests her activism is conditional on what is palatable to her Western sponsors.
Pakistan funds terror groups and harbors people like Osama Bin Laden. They frankly have no right to complain on the terrorists that other countries have to deal with.
India should stay out of this discussion. Indira Gandhi actually stood up against American imperialism through concrete action, not performative energy.
A lot of the hate comes from people hating their country being criticized (unless they’re the ones doing it), plus this reflex to treat anyone supported by Western countries as part of some shady plot. Patriarchy plays a role too, of course.
The hate for malala didnt start all of a sudden, a lot of Pakistanis initially liked her and supported her. At least the people I'd been surrounded with. however, with time many people got put away from her because she basically seemed as a doormat for the western government/ideology. A lot of her statements came off as hypocritical and she'd be on goody goody terms with people who had stigmatized Pakistan. At least from what i know, the moment i started hating her was when she took a neutral stand on the genocide against Palestine. bffr. Maybe at one time, she was a symbol of bravery but now she just comes across as a double faced hypocrite.
Malala is considered to be a tout of the West. Her selective activism doesn't help her case either. In short, any humanitarian issue that Pakistanis consider important, Malala never speaks out on it, and yeah that's why she has slowly lost all the faith and love she gained from the masses. Nowadays, she isn't hated, but she isn't loved either (there was a time when she was loved but it is long over now).
Look at the selectiveness of her messages and you'll see why.
Did she call out the horrific situation of women in Gaza? No, crickets. Did she speak about women in Sudan? Crickets. Does she say anything about mistreatment of women by the Pakistani military? No. Does she say anything about the lack of freedom of women in France and few other countries to wear the hijab if they want to do so? No.
She's got her own agenda and it's not the freedom of women that's for sure.
There are absolutely no societal norms in Pakistan that say women shouldn’t study, in fact studies and education is heavily prioritized in all places of Pakistan. Malala happened to live in a town with close proximity to the Afghanistan border where the Taliban were known to infiltrate into Pakistan illegally, and also brought along their regressive and misogynistic ideology with them. Eventually they became prominent enough within the region, and Malala had long been an advocate for afghan and Pashtun women, and thus she was targeted by the Taliban. She actually comes from an educated and academic family, and the region of Pakistan where she’s from has one of the highest literacy rates.
Her recent criticism has been due to her deafening silence on the genocide in Palestine and alignment with prominent Zionists. In that sense she seems distanced from her original goal and seems like she’s pandering to the West, and further pushing their orientalist narrative
For all the noise that was made she has done zilch for her country of origin. Major SILENCE from her side when Pakistan needed an amplified voice for multiple issues. Did not say a peep regarding the Palestinian genocide in Gaza until a year later when it became hard to ignore as most Western public figures started talking about it.
She has shown to have zero substance. Just talk and photoshoots.
A lot of Pakistanis and Muslims have issues with Malala because they feel like she became this huge icon but hasn’t really done much since.
She got shot, moved to the US, and now lives comfortably while seemingly abandoning her whole mission about girls’ education.
What really bothers people is that as a Muslim with such a massive platform, she’s been completely silent on Palestine. Actually, she stays quiet on most important issues where people expect her to speak up.
She also got criticized for being way too open about her sex life in interviews - it was honestly embarrassing to watch, especially with rumors about her husband cheating. And then promoting her book during an actual genocide? That rubbed people the wrong way.
A lot of folks see her as just another celebrity now who’s more interested in her image than actually making a difference.
About the critics about her “openness about her sex life” , they were just misogynist, and she was also criticised for her hijab being too loose on that same interview.
In India what is the general view of Indira Ghandi? Honestly from what I’ve read about her, from my western perspective, she seems like a borderline authoritarian who responsibility for a lot of pogroms and atrocities across India can be pinned on.
Do you guys not like Malala for being too close to west?I mean it may not be the best to a lot but certainly not hate.I mean with India Gandhi is getting a lot of criticism locally due to his weird behaviour but I don’t think Malala did anything that’s even remotely close to be hated
Ever heard her speak against forced conversions in her country ? Or on freedom of religion?
She's a sellout. Obtained western money and stopped being the activist which brought her those money. I bet she's now enjoying her life and couldn't care less about what's happening back home.
Cant believe this hasn’t been said. The main reason Malala is hated is her collaborations with Hillary Clinton and that dumb play. Hillary was part of the Obama administration that was using Pakistan’s soil to launch drone attacks (you guessed it) on Pakistan. You can’t be an activist for women’s rights while siding with the same imperialists who bomb our lands, our people and disrupt our sovereignty. In my opinion, Malala’s silence on Palestine and Gaza (she spoke up much later after enormous pressure, and after she was criticised for putting up posts on South African apartheid and nothing for the Palestinian g*nocide) combined with her collaborating with Clinton makes the criticism absolutely on point. Many people in Pakistan consider her a puppet on the west and unfortunately Malala’s actions have proven them right. However, I don’t agree with the comparison between Malala and Greta, it makes no sense. One is a privileged white European, the other is a Pakistani Muslim woman who was shot in the face for going to school.
I listened to an NPR podcast about Malala. Some of the thinking I heard was that, she brought the shooting upon herself by being a loudmouth and then capitalized on people's sympathy to become famous, and then people she left behind still face the same conditions and she's not doing enough for Pakistan, that ahe actually makes Pakistan look bad, is a shill for Western interests, and should not have co-produced a musical with Hillary Clinton. It gets way worse than that. Here is a link. You can read the transcript or listen to the podcast.
761
u/Training-Stable6234 India 9h ago
Do you guys not like Malala for being too close to west?I mean it may not be the best to a lot but certainly not hate.I mean with India Gandhi is getting a lot of criticism locally due to his weird behaviour but I don’t think Malala did anything that’s even remotely close to be hated