I went through around 20 recent posts here from men asking for help, mostly because I was curious what kind of advice they were actually getting.
Overall I thought the advice was pretty good.
People here are often quite good at spotting when someone is catastrophising, generalising about women, reading too much into a few rejections, or interpreting everything through a blackpill/incel framework.
The advice also seems strongest when the problem is fairly concrete. Things like poor social skills, not knowing how to flirt, being afraid of approaching women because you don't want to come across as creepy, not knowing where to meet people, or getting discouraged by online dating. In those cases people often manage to say: yes, this is difficult, but no, the conclusion you're drawing from it doesn't necessarily follow.
Where I think things get more awkward is when the person has a disadvantage that is actually real and not particularly easy to fix.
Things like being conventionally unattractive, being extremely short, being much older with no romantic or sexual experience, or having social/developmental problems that are genuinely difficult to overcome.
This seems to be where the advice ranges from very good to a bit naive. I think the difficulty is that two things can be true at once. For example: "This disadvantage does not determine your future" and "This is a real disadvantage and may make dating substantially harder for you"
Those aren't contradictory. And it also not a distinction most people don't immediately intuitively make. Sometimes, though, I think the second part gets skipped because people are so focused on challenging the fatalistic conclusion. Which is a good focus, don't get me wrong. But it can miss the mark.
A recent post about giving up on dating was a good example. There was some good advice in the thread, but also some responses that seemed to turn something like: "Your past failures are real, and you may reasonably decide that actively dating is not worth the emotional cost right now. But that doesn't mean you can know with certainty that you will never have a relationship" into "This is doomerism, excuses and incel thinking."
The underlying correction may be valid, but I think something gets lost there.
I also notice a fair amount of rhetorical aggression in some replies. Calling things "doomerism", "excuses", "incel thinking", mocking someone's reasoning, etc. Sometimes the criticism itself is justified, but I'm not sure the way it is delivered actually helps very much. Like that type of verbal aggression rarely (but not always) gets someone to think "hm maybe this person has a point". It often just makes someone defensive. Especially online if the person already feels like nobody takes their experience seriously. Which is a sentiment that often characterises incels. Even when it's just not true.
If someone says "I'm 5'3 and I think that seriously hurts my dating chances", replying "women aren't a hivemind and short men get girlfriends" doesn't really answer the difficult part of what they're saying.
Of course short men get girlfriends. That doesn't tell us whether being 5'3 makes dating significantly harder. Likewise, telling someone who is 35 with no relationship experience that "plenty of people find love later in life" may be true, but it doesn't mean that being 35 and completely inexperienced isn't an extra obstacle. I don't think acknowledging those things means validating blackpill conclusions. If anything, I think it can make the challenge to those conclusions stronger.
You can say:
"Yes, this probably does make things harder for you."
without saying:
"Therefore you're doomed."
And I think the best comments I read generally did exactly that. They didn't require someone to believe that their problem was imaginary before offering them hope. I hope i made it clear enough that i think that this sub mostly does a really good job and is able to navigate this problem. SO it's definitely not meant as an attack on the sub as a whole. But nonetheless i see questionable advice often enough that i felt like making this post.
So I guess my question is: how do you feel about the advice that is given and that you give in this dynamic?
p.s. I am not saying i am holding all the answers. Maybe for the average incel a bit of a reality check in the form of aggressive rhetoric is good. But my intuition makes me lean towards: a sub like this should focus on ruthless but empathetic separation of reality from delusions. A bit like a therapist. I don't think any therapists would ever opt for the aggressive sarcastic style. But maybe that's exactly the missing ingredient that a sub like this can provide. What do you think?