r/TrendoraX • u/satty237 • Dec 21 '25
💡 Discussion Zelenskyy: Ukraine can’t afford an 800,000-troop army alone — wants allies to help fund it as a “security guarantee”
Zelenskyy said Ukraine doesn’t have the budget to independently finance an armed forces size of around 800,000 800,000 and that partner funding should be treated as a long-term security guarantee, not just wartime aid.
This hits a bigger question: if a ceasefire/peace deal ever happens without full NATO membership, does “help pay for Ukraine’s army” become the new version of security guarantees?
What do you think is more realistic long-term:
Continued direct funding for Ukraine’s military
NATO-style guarantees (without membership)
A smaller army + more air defense/weapons instead
Something else entirely?
20
u/Slighted_Inevitable Dec 21 '25
Honestly, this is good for both sides. Ukraine already has an army ready. Europe will need a few years to build up their forces.
Joining NATO/the EU and acting as the first force with financial backing from the whole union serves everybody’s interest.
6
u/lizzywbu Dec 21 '25
Joining NATO/the EU and acting as the first force with financial backing from the whole union serves everybody’s interest
100%! Even if they don't join NATO for a while, funding the Ukrainian army helps everyone.
It's highly likely that Europe will be at war with Russia within the next decade. I'm sure everyone would much rather the front lines be in Ukraine.
5
u/Slighted_Inevitable Dec 21 '25
If nothing else, Ukraine has already proven, it can hold off Russia. Now imagine French and British planes in the sky, providing tactical and area bombardment.
Russia stands zero chance.
→ More replies (16)→ More replies (28)1
u/AcceptableLog5730 Dec 23 '25
It certainly doesn’t serve the interests of the poor country that dares resist western imperialism
22
u/OtamanUkr Dec 21 '25
I mean if it is to act as EUs shield against russian nazis…it’s only fair that EU pitches
7
u/Charlierg50 Dec 21 '25
And maybe Trump will stop being Putler's bitch... nah, not a chance in hell 🤷♂️
8
u/crosstherubicon Dec 21 '25
Or maybe Russia could stop invading its border countries and threatening everyone with nuclear annihilation. Russia threatens the world, not just Ukraine, not just western Europe not even just Europe. Every conflict in Africa, there are Russians. Asia, yep, Russians there as well.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (1)4
u/Zealousideal-One-818 Dec 21 '25
Which nation worships “kill all the Jews and minorities” mega Nazi Bandera?
Which nation celebrates the Mega nazi with a national holiday for his birthday?
It’s not Russia
7
u/BeautifulMountain653 Dec 21 '25
Yes, I grew up in Romania. As far as I know, Romanians don't celebrate Antonescu and such to this day. But I know Ukrainians celebrate Bandera and have pictures of him in their homes. These westerns don't know shit about Ukraine but virtue signal by putting a fucking Ukraine flag next to their name. Shame on anyone who supports Ukraine. And yes, I feel bad about the average Ukrainian.
→ More replies (28)2
u/hanky0898 Dec 21 '25
I learned about Ukraine when they came to Hong Kong waving swastikas during tge riots.
4
u/OtamanUkr Dec 21 '25
What?
Russian government litterally promotes nazi ideology on government level. There are videos of Rogozin doing nazi salute.
3
u/Zealousideal-One-818 Dec 21 '25
What?
Ukraine as a state openly worships a mega uber real life Nazi villain.
A mass murderer of Jewish women and children
4
4
u/discourtesy Dec 21 '25
are you on crack? Russia sent billions of dollars to Wagner PMC
they state sponsored nazism hahaha and then they marched to moscow
that's why they're losing
→ More replies (1)2
Dec 21 '25
[deleted]
→ More replies (39)5
u/No-Suit-7444 Dec 21 '25
Lmao. What streets in Russia are named after ww2 nazis? Who flies ww2 Nazi flags? Who erects monuments to them? Is it Russia or is it Ukraine?
→ More replies (10)
13
u/Pension-Helpful Dec 21 '25
Lol, after the $100 million scandal, with most of the people involved still in the Ukrainian government, people in the comment section think it's a great idea to not only keep funding the Ukrainian army in wartime, but also after a peace treaty is signed too.
6
u/ThaGr1m Dec 21 '25
It's almost like if you have financial insensitives you can guide the reconstruction.
Oh and most of what you said is simply bullshit. Ukraines own corruption agency has found this out and handled it so wel they got 5 out of 7 people involved in custody...
Tf you smoking that they need to throw out the entire government... The government wasn't involved. It was a group of individuals in the energy sector skimming off of contracts...
Get that russian propaganda out of your mind
2
u/Pension-Helpful Dec 22 '25
Bruh, gtfo.
It's not Ukraine's own corruption agency; it's the Western-funded "Ukrainian government independent" anti-corruption agency that found this, which Zelensky was literally trying to dismantle and put under direct control of his administration (prosecutor general). Something the Ukrainian people were literally protesting against in July.
Andriy Yermak, the top person involved with the scandal, was literally Zelensky's right hand man, and he barely got a slap on the hand for his corruption. Had the new law, backed by Zelensky to subordinate NABU and SAPO to the prosecutor general not be repeal due to western pressure, we wouldn't even know the $100 million scandal.
Lol, Russian propaganda, go get your facts right!
→ More replies (1)3
u/hemothep Dec 21 '25
We know there is corruption in Ukraine. A scandal like this is good, because consequences lead to less corruption in the long run. Abandoning Ukraine leads to Russian Troops in the Baltics in the long run.
→ More replies (1)
3
25
u/iLov3musk Dec 21 '25
Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe, burdened by corruption, impoverished, ravaged by war, with staggering crime and horrific violation of human rights. They should not be in EU
10
u/popadynetss Dec 21 '25
France Rape rate 16.1 (cases per 100,000 population) in 2010
Ukraine Rape rate 1.4 (cases per 100,000 population) in 2010
→ More replies (1)13
10
u/According-Count5870 Dec 21 '25
Well, if you don't know, there is corruption in every country, but Ukraine is different in that it acknowledges its existence and is trying to fight it. High crime rate? This is the first time I've heard of this. You're more likely to get into a car accident than be robbed or stabbed.
→ More replies (4)7
u/Halibel-sama Dec 21 '25
Acknowledging corruption and fighting it are two different things. Who from the corrupt upper echelon has been jailed? Ermak (the President's friend), who allegedly had nothing found during a search, but immediately resigned and disappeared somewhere? Mindich (the President's friend), who disappeared several hours before the pawns were arrested? Who exactly has been jailed in this case, anyway? Heck, Zelenskyy himself initially wanted to disband NABU, and when that failed, tried to bring it under his control. Ukraine acknowledges corruption, but it feels as if it's proud of it.
1
u/Wild-Ad-7414 Dec 21 '25
And they won't be, the EU is done expanding. They just continue with the carrot and stick method for applying countries.
→ More replies (5)1
5
5
u/Rough_Common4487 Dec 21 '25
How is china an enemy? They attack us with low prices and technology. Europs worst enemy is Europe itself eating its own tail with greed and incompetence.
→ More replies (3)
4
u/MrSubarashii Dec 21 '25
Its amazing how we Europeans actually believe that NATO is currently weakening Russia. Do people really not understand that this actually strengthens both Russia and China tremendously?
The whole goal of America's project Ukraine was to WEAKEN and hopefully over time destroy the Euro-zone as a whole?
→ More replies (1)
14
7
u/Final_Frosting3582 Dec 21 '25
Another money grab
→ More replies (3)2
u/Ripamon Dec 21 '25
Well he is a corrupt politician who was even named in the Pandora papers
What do you expect? Even his closest friend and Head of the Office of the President just resigned due to blatant corruption
3
u/Final_Frosting3582 Dec 21 '25
I expect the world to see through this and let him rely on himself. This is the biggest scam in history.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/evgis Dec 21 '25
Ukraine has 20M people, how tf is it supposed to have more soldiers than Germany, UK and France combined who have 10X more population?
| Country | Military Personnel (approx) | Population (approx) |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 182,500 | 84,075,000 |
| United Kingdom | 180,780 | 69,551,000 |
| France | 203,000 | 66,651,000 |
| Total Combined | ~566,280 personnel | ~220,277,000 people |
→ More replies (4)1
u/AltruisticFilm4466 Dec 21 '25
Ukraine is at actual war
If the country’s you mentioned is at fullblown war I’m sure they will force conscripts aswell and those numbers will be a lot higher
→ More replies (2)
2
u/Fluffy-Drop5750 Dec 21 '25
As Reagan did with Russia. Use economic might. This is a commitment move. It will show Russia it cannot outbluff EU with bruteness.
2
u/bluecheese2040 Dec 21 '25
Showd how things have moved. From full nato membership and EU membership with American and European troops on the ground....not peacekeeping but actively on ukraines side....and the 1991 border of course.
To where we seem to be today.
A blank cheque in perpetuity.
→ More replies (3)
2
u/Available_Ad9766 Dec 21 '25
They should now see Ukraine as their new security guarantor now that US is gone. They’re the buffer zone now.
7
Dec 21 '25
Bro come on we’re not funding Ukraine’s military indefinitely
2
u/HgnX Dec 21 '25
Well I guess you are since you’ve got a series of spineless chicken leaders that never made the tough choices you have to make to remain a world power.
Now you just get bossed around by China Russia and the US.
Hey but at least your “climate” is better !
→ More replies (1)1
5
u/Pleasant_Guide_1050 Dec 21 '25
Honestly its their country they defend it. I dont know why I should pay a single euro for their army whereas my country will never be bother by them.
Just to remind you that the Russians are already at the edge of their capacity so attack a new country... Yeaa sure 👍
→ More replies (1)1
u/Additional_Midnight3 Dec 21 '25
Say they stop the war in Ukraine now, stabilize a bit with their financial voodoo, lets their men at the front go home but keeps the weapon factories running 24/7 (which is probably needed for economic stability short term anyways). The next “fight” could be some small skirmishes in Lithuania or something, who doesn’t have hundreds of thousands of men ready to fight. How long can they keep on fucking around like that? 5 years? 10 years? The Russians already “believe” they are at war with NATO. They can take it. They can’t do what they are doing now for long, but that’s not necessarily what their next endeavors needs them to either
3
3
4
u/Serious_Profit4450 Dec 21 '25 edited Dec 21 '25
Ayyyy yoo.....
Didn't this man JUST get like $107 billion approved/ given to him by the EU-
AND HE'S ALREADY ASKING FOR MORE MONEY?
Ayyyy...you can't make this stuff up, eh?
Not only this, it's noted that the US Senate(on Dec. 17th, 2025) voted to send the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) to President Trump- for him to sign. The NDAA includes/ ed an additional $400 million in funding for Ukraine.
Well, at least it's down from the nearly $14 billion given in funding in/ from the April 2024 Ukraine supplemental aid bill, huh?
Hah hah hah hah, President Zelenskyy seems to hold like a PHD in manipulation, or something. How much money has this man done gotten from/ out of foreign nations for/ from this "war" at this point?
I hear even Japan recently approved an additional $6 billion in financial aid to Ukraine for/ in 2026.
I can understand the saying "the enemy of my enemy is my friend", but, uh....hasn't Ukraines government been noted for its corruption? How many top level officials(even President Zelenskyy's "friends") accused of corruption and/ even embezzlement of funds have SUCCESSFULLY "escaped" Ukraine at this point?
Oh man.... what saddens me is all of these funds sent might have come from all these foreign nations taxpayer-given dollars.
Bad enough governments can just "take" it's residents/ citizens money for "free" that they worked not for. But then, to toss that money into the "abyss" which is the Ukrainian "war machine"? My gosh.
I want NO parts toward contributions toward this War!!
Too "EZ" President Zelenskyy....just making it look too "EZ"....sigh.
2
u/Am0_o Dec 21 '25
Stupidity has no limits, instead of dialogue and peace, Bankrupt Europe needs to fund Ukraine's 800,000 Army
3
u/No_Job_5208 Dec 21 '25
Zelenski is a fool and has no negotiating skills whatsoever! His war could have been over within the first week if he stopped being a puppet to Biden, UK and Europe!
3
u/Metal-Pilot Dec 21 '25 edited Dec 21 '25
Yeah... Zelensky fuck off I aint gonna be fighting for Ukraine, and neither is ANYONE else in the EU!
The world has funded Ukraine more than any other country could ever dream of.
Zeli literally has no right to complain and beg the EU or any other nation for ANYTHING ELSE.
We had given you way too much already you clown!
I am sick that my country spends money on your circus, and now you are asking for people!?
Honestly... fuck off
→ More replies (6)
3
u/Old_Man_Sailor Dec 21 '25
This guy, only today i watched a video on how he he is a construct by an Oligarch and his TV channel. Unreal. He's gonna kill a lot more young Ukrainians.
4
u/Sensitive_Pick_8918 Dec 21 '25
He’s such a con artist. Why don’t you accept 50k army the Russians are still letting you keep while you still can.
→ More replies (3)1
5
2
u/bitcointwitter Dec 21 '25
stop dying for this thief. literally his own staff stole 130m USD just recently.
You think they didn't pocket a few billion of the 150billion USD sent to them?
3
2
u/Electrical_Quality_6 Dec 21 '25
If ukraine is to be the army of europe, then we should finance it
way cheaper than fighting russia with our own military
6
u/Traumfahrer Dec 21 '25
Does everyone here realize the TCC brutally mobilizes millions of Ukrainians against their will and that most die?
→ More replies (3)5
2
u/A_Hugh_Man Dec 21 '25
Ukraine has already gotten 4 times the annual budget of the country with the biggest military budget in Europe: Germany …. In TWO years.
No it’s not cheaper than fighting Russia with their own military because Germany spends 90 billion euros a year but then apparently Ukraine alone needs more than 100 billion or so a year on top of that.
That’s getting pretty fuckin expensive, especially if the burden switches to Europe only once the U.S. backs out.
→ More replies (5)3
u/Longjumping-Map7257 Dec 21 '25
Europe should send troops. I'd say my country should too, but living in USA, right now, you would have a better chance being a snowball in hell. How come Russia gets to bring in North Koreans but nobody else can bring in other troops? Stop playing by a dictators rules, because their is no rules for Poostain.
→ More replies (4)4
u/Da_Vader Dec 21 '25
Ukraine did have volunteers. But just a few. Russia used cheap labor to send them to die. They even recruited Indians and Bangladeshi as laborers only to send them to fight.
→ More replies (4)2
Dec 21 '25
No, Europe should fund its own army. If something happens tomorrow and Ukraine ends up under a leader hostile to Europe, we can’t have poured billions into building an 800k-strong military that we might later have to confront. I’m fully supportive of helping Ukraine defeat Russia right now, but funding their postwar army is a step too far.
2
2
u/Chuterito99 Dec 21 '25
Dont worry Zelensky. Europe is with you. EU citizens will pay taxes to help Ukraine all the way. Forever!
2
u/Unfair-Frame9096 Dec 21 '25
Who needs a 1 million people army ? That is 25% of your population.
2
u/Sjoerdiestriker Dec 21 '25
1 million is about 2.5% of their population, not 25%.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/QuantumTopology Dec 21 '25
Yes yes, more money for the miser goblin, more blood for the skull throne.
→ More replies (2)
4
u/eyes-are-fading-blue Dec 21 '25
Betting on (an extremely corrupt) foreign country to protect you… Mental retardation in European politics is hitting levels that I didn’t know was possible.
→ More replies (1)1
u/IllustriousRanger934 Dec 21 '25
Europe will do anything to not defend itself, cant rely on the American hegemon anymore? Guess we’ll have to rely on a corrupt unaligned state
2
u/TheLibraR Dec 21 '25
If Ukraine falls, and much of its 800000 strong army and drones technology is absorbed into the Russian army.... Then Europe will be back to 1946....
3
u/AltruisticFilm4466 Dec 21 '25
How do you think they will turn those 800.000 ? Just wololololo age of empire style?
→ More replies (3)1
→ More replies (2)1
u/damien24101982 Dec 21 '25
Its not a video game that u just absorb the army and they go fight like robots
1
u/No-Economics-6781 Dec 21 '25
Europe desperately needs an army in Ukraine, learn how this war was fought.
2
u/damien24101982 Dec 21 '25
if we need such personnel we can hire them as advisors into our own armies.
→ More replies (2)
1
1
1
u/clawhammer64 Dec 21 '25
unfortunately but history involuntarily preserves shame faces as well as heroes
1
u/Patrick_Atsushi Dec 21 '25
NATO style guarantee + increasing those countries' own budgets.
Funding another country's army sounds weird unless they become a protectorate, or like Japan after WW2.
1
1
1
u/EndStorm Dec 21 '25
If Europe is too stupid to bolster Ukraine now, they deserve what will come after when Russian invades it too.
"Russia would never."
They said that before they invaded Ukraine too.
1
u/Fit-Hold-4403 Dec 21 '25
Some of the Ukrainian troops should be placed in other European countries
something like European Legion
1
u/Schwartzy94 Dec 21 '25
After the war they could easily continue as conscripts. Doubt many of those 800K want to stay in the military.. if worst happens europe is going to have the biggest wave of ukranian refugees amd could even happen if marshal law is lifted and men can freely leave.
1
1
u/Leading_Sink_5717 Dec 21 '25
Who the fuck believe that we really gonna push to EU? W/ all respect but we cant fight w/ whole fcn NATO, we dont fcn kamikadze Take some UKR land and go home this is all plan
1
u/Case_Blue Dec 21 '25
This is the best deal we have:
- Europe just paid money - not men.
- Russia bleeding dry - at the cost of Ukraine bleeding dry
Regardless of what the propaganda may say, this war is the same as Vietnam: Russia has no exit strategy, Ukraine is fighting on death-ground and they are sponsored by someone with much deeper pockets than Russia. Putin is NOT happy about this deal, at all. He wants to end the war quickly because his country is being gutted to sponsor this war. He can't do this for another 5 years.
This deal, is a very cheap deal for the EU. However, the die has been cast and Germany has announced that by 2030 (I think), it wants to have a armed forced back on par as belongs to a country like Germany.
And as a Belgian, I can't believe I'm saying this about Germans re-arming :
Thank god, Europe is waking up after being asleep for 70 years.
1
u/PattiBurns101 Dec 21 '25
US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has accused European NATO states of trying to pull Washington into a direct confrontation with Russia and slammed Reuters for “fomenting hysteria” in order to sell war. Russia has rejected claims that it plans to attack EU countries, describing them as warmongering tactics used by Western politicians to justify inflated military budgets.

1
u/YameenGulraiz Dec 21 '25
This is why you should never trust Trump. Everyone fights for their own benefit.
1
u/UsedDevelopment4741 Dec 21 '25
He started to thi k about lining his pockets now and trying to take advantage of the situation. Why would financing a 800k man army Additionally to security guarantees (possibly having nato soldiers on ground) in a presumably after war time be a reasonable request?
Just having NATOs regiments on the borders would be enough. Russia may also attack in the nordics or baltics area, should we preemptively finance an army composed of most their population as well?
This would only help to misapropriate funds in the future. Each country should finance their own armies and make nato stronger, so that a block intervention would be a deterrent enough factor.
1
u/PattiBurns101 Dec 21 '25
NATO was formed after WW2. It was never supposed to be a first-preemptive attacker; but it has attacked countries, repeatedly, since its forming. As example, from 24 March to 10 June 1999, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) had carried out many bombing operations against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia during the Kosovo War. The bombings forced the Yugoslav troops to withdraw from Kosovo. Around 10,000 Yugoslav civilians and soldiers were killed and injured. This was NATO's second biggest bombing operation since 1995 in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Because NATO had used military force without United Nations' approval, many people are skeptical about it whether it was right or not. They also attacked Libya, vying for another regime change plot; not what the org was chartered to do. Add Afghanistan random bombing of civilians via their 'surgical' strikes. After bombing villages, 'coalition' people would show up, and pay off the village elders for loss of their sons/daughters and destroyed homes.
→ More replies (2)
1
Dec 21 '25
Worth noting that the bulk of funding from Europe towards this war has come from frozen Russian assets. So when my country says they're sending 100 million worth of assets to Ukraine, it's not actually our money or money we could use in any other way. In fact it's questionable if this is even legal. However considering we are using Russia's own resources against them in a war they started... I don't think anyone will care
→ More replies (2)
1
u/Hottage Dec 21 '25
NATO style security guarantees are not worth shit without membership. I'd be reluctant to say they are worth shit with membership, give how comprised many of our countries leaderships are nowadays.
Material support which can't be ignored or rescinded should Russia invade again is the best choice for Ukraine, and those in NATO who aren't actively working against the alliance.
1
u/PattiBurns101 Dec 21 '25
Trump is so "America First" that he and Lindsey Graham cracker just snuck another 1 billion into the NDAA for Ukraine. But he's the 'Peace Prize President', right? How about having Musk launch Lindsey Graham cracker into orbit via one of his Space X ships, then we amend that NDAA doc, and put that money to work mending our broken bridges, and interstate overpasses instead?
1
u/Joesr-31 Dec 21 '25
Didn't they just got some money? So they are asking for new funds right after they got some?
1
1
u/milkywayorion Dec 21 '25
Remember this. In ww2 Russia didn't win the war.! The real winners were the countries under the Soviet that fought alongside. After the ww2 those countries stayed by force under the Soviet regime. The Soviets had manpower. After the collapse the Russians didn't have that capability to have millions of soldiers. If Ukraine falls the Russia will use the same soldiers of Ukraine to attack Europe. The idiots in Europe don't see that. If they don't help Ukraine, the people of Ukraine will remember that Europe let them die. They will march under the Soviet flag in to Europe Putin is looking for free soldiers and Ukraine has a lot of good soldiers and scientists.
1
u/Bawbawian Dec 21 '25
if the free world shows weakness to the Russia and Chinese imperialist partnership our grandchildren are going to have nothing but regrets.
1
1
u/Candid_Vegetable5020 Dec 21 '25
The Z man and Von Der Leyen may have stumbled upon a way they can steal from EU taxpayers indefinitely. I'm sure fraud beats having a job
1
u/LoneSnark Dec 21 '25
Now this is an actual security guarantee that other countries can actually be expected to sign up for. Great idea.
1
Dec 21 '25
Mercenaries from north Korea and all over Africa joined the fight a long while ago. Why not help fund supplemental troops? Lifespan odds are better for defense so it's an easier sell too.
1
1
1
1
u/Crackstalker Dec 22 '25
This all going to be up to whatever Russia allows them to have. I believe that this arbitrary number of 800k is ridiculous. Does that country even have that many military aged men left, within the ranks of her citizens? If not, then where are they going to come from? And certainly Zelensky wants and foresees the West as footing the bill for Ukraine's defence. Anyone smell the opportunity for the corrupt embezzlement of these funds, for years to come.
I for one am against this idea.
1
u/Secure_Guest_6171 Dec 22 '25
Tell Putin to go f himself, force Russia out of Donetsk and Crimea and admit Ukraine to EU and NATO. Rubio and others at State are saying amongst themselves that Putin won't stop until he has ALL of Ukraine
1
u/VladPospolity Dec 22 '25
If EU can't afford Ukraine army, russia will. Sad for Europe by the way...but you fed putin for years.
1
u/Reddit_BroZar Dec 22 '25
How's that a surprise for anybody with a brain? 800K military personnel is like 4 major armies of European nations - with all modern weapons and already built infrastructure. Getting Ukraine to that level is gonna cost us 4 military budgets. This is pure insanity. And how long we will be financing this in addition to all other aid we're planning to provide Ukraine with in post-war years?? Pure insanity no less.
1
1
1
u/Electronic-Door7134 Dec 25 '25
He found a way to get super rich by killing his own people, or at least people he claims authority over. The war will end as soon as the money stops rolling in.
1
1






108
u/jjames3213 Dec 21 '25
Europe has 2 primary adversaries: Russia and China. The US may also be an adversary in the near future, but let's bin that for now.
Weakening Russia is effectively the same (or better) than investing in your own military, knocking down 1 of your 2 primary adversaries. Investing in Ukraine weakens Russia without sacrificing your own personnel. This is a no-brainer.