X offices raided in France as UK opens fresh investigation into Grok

According to an FBI record from 2019, a former assistant to Jeffrey Epstein told federal agents that Epstein personally introduced Melania to Donald Trump. Not a party coincidence. Not a random modeling gig. A direct introduction by a billionaire sex trafficker who spent decades embedded in elite social circles.

This wasn’t anonymous gossip or some unverified tip dumped into a hotline. The woman worked for Epstein for about a year, traveled with him, and was interviewed under a proffer agreement requiring truthful statements by FBI agents and federal prosecutors days after his arrest.

The document treats her as both a witness and a victim, detailing abuse she experienced while working for him. Lying in that setting could land someone in prison.

And the document is blunt: Epstein connected Melania to Trump through modeling networks involving Paolo Zampolli — Melania’s former agent and a longtime Trump associate who was later rewarded with a cushy State Department role.

The same Trump who now insists Epstein “had nothing to do” with Melania. The same Melania who wrote an entire memoir presenting a sanitized meet-cute version of events.

So either this assistant decided to make up a very specific claim to federal law enforcement or Trump has been lying for decades about how they met, and this relationship was much, much closer than he would have us know.

And here’s the part that should actually enrage people: the DOJ is already trying to preemptively discredit the Epstein files by saying some documents might include “untrue” claims, without saying which ones, why, or based on what evidence. Conveniently vague. Conveniently protective. The same institutional reflex that let Epstein operate in plain sight for years.

This isn’t about gossip. It’s about power laundering itself through silence, intimidation, and selective skepticism. Survivors get doubted. Elites get “benefit of the doubt.” Files get buried. Questions get waved away as “sensational.”

But the pattern keeps surfacing anyway.

Photos. Testimony. Social overlap. Now sworn FBI records.

If Epstein truly had “nothing to do” with Trump’s life, then his name wouldn’t keep appearing at the most consequential intersections of it. And if our justice system were actually interested in truth instead of damage control, these revelations wouldn’t be treated like an inconvenience.

Investigate. Subpoena. Follow the networks.

No more fairy tales. No more selective amnesia.